Wild 3 Team Trade Offer.

[Last Place]

Just received an interesting offer for my team in the signature and wanted to get some outside input. Below are the trade details

Team 1 Gives
Chase
2024 1.10

Team 2 Gives
2024 1.3
Burrow
2024 2.3

Team 3 (my team) gives
Barkley
Swift
Tua
Metcalf
2024 3.2


Team 1 Receives
2024 1.3

Team 2 Receives
Barkley
Swift
Metcalf
Tua
2024 3.2

Team 3 Receives
Chase
Burrow
2024 1.10
2024 2.3

The other two teams have apparently already discussed and agreed (im not privy to those conversations). Every time I look at the trade I swing between the thoughts of "why wouldn't i do this!?" and "cant do it". Would appreciate whatever the community has to say. My concern is I'm giving up a lot of depth to get 2 guys and 2 picks, but on the flip side, im getting 2 elite guys and two picks that could nab some depth pieces.

[BellCow]

Trade looks good for you but I think team 1 loses a bit even in superflex

[Gator Sens]

In SF, the team getting Chase, Burrow and somehow a 1st is coming out well ahead here. Tua is solid, but he is not in a healthy Burrow's tier on value or outlook. Great deal for team 3. Barkley, Metcalf, and Swift are all not elite and Barkley's value will drop with age.

[Bay City Original]

I love this trade for you. I think you give up some players who may not be or may no longer be elite (or near elite) players for an elite WR (Chase) and top 5 QB.

With your roster, I love the prospect of trotting out each week:
Allen, Burrow
Etienne, Hall, Gibbs
Chase, Wilson, Smth-Njigba or Downs,
Hockenson, Kincaid, McBride

In a TEP, I can see Kincaid and McBride, essentially, scoring as weekly WR2/3.

Yes, your depth does take a little bit of a hit but with your picks and/or trades, you can easily backfill that.

As a side note... I hate the deal for Team 1 (overpay for a draft pick) and think Team 2 is getting solid return on what he gives up.

[frerichs5]

If I was team 3, yes, I’d take it.

Can’t figure out why in the world team 1 wants to do this though.

[Prison_Mike]

If I was team 3, yes, I’d take it.

Can’t figure out why in the world team 1 wants to do this though.

x2

I can't imagine why anyone would give Chase + 1.10 for 1.03. But if this has been accepted by the other two, jump on it

[Last Place]

If I was team 3, yes, I’d take it.

Can’t figure out why in the world team 1 wants to do this though.

x2

I can't imagine why anyone would give Chase + 1.10 for 1.03. But if this has been accepted by the other two, jump on it

I agree. He was the one that apparently started the conversation about it. Hes in a complete rebuild and Chase is his only player of value left. He will now have picks 1, 2 and 3 in 2024, 5 1sts in 2025 and 3 in 2026.

[The.Big.Spank]

If I was team 3, yes, I’d take it.

Can’t figure out why in the world team 1 wants to do this though.

x3

Team 1 is nuts for doing this.

[TheTroll]

If I was team 3, yes, I’d take it.

Can’t figure out why in the world team 1 wants to do this though.

this is how i feel... Team 3...clear for take off

[tstafford]

If I was team 3, yes, I’d take it.

Can’t figure out why in the world team 1 wants to do this though.

This.

Terrible for Team 1.

[saw061600]

Piling on for you to take, Team 1 bonkers.