Pitts or Hold

[Ghost Of Kevin White]

I give:
Mahomes or Herbert
Buckner

I get:
Pitts
Tua

Which side?

[MarkoH97]

You already have Hockenson and it's not TEP. Would much rather hold and seek a move for a tier 1 WR for one of the QBs here.

[BigBawseRoss]

good return in a 1qb but knowing you have a stud at qb every week in a 16 team is nice. i dont think id want to mess with that for a te and losing a top dl in the process

[Gator Sens]

Hold. Too much here based on value and build.

[ColdZealDonkeyStrike]

Pitts is just as valuable as a tier 1 wr unless it's Jefferson or Chase, and you get a solid young QB coming back. Unless I'm severely missing the idp value with Buckner this is Pitts for me pretty easily for me.

[Needalife]

I'm just not that bullish on Tua's outlook. That, plus the lack of TE premium, makes me vote hold. Your QBs are elite and Buckner is hardly a throw in. I'm a massive Kyle Pitts guy but can't get on board with this one.

[Stone2987]

In 1 QB I’m getting Pitts.

[Bulletproof]

This is 1QB?

If you have two QB1s, I don’t understand why you wouldn’t move one for an elite dynasty asset like Pitts. Is this team a contender and about where would a player of Buckner’s value go in a start up draft?

[Ice]

1 QB league; Pitts by infinity regardless which QB you move.

[honcho55]

16 team makes it a little closer but I’d take Pitts just to avoid the hassle of picking between Mahomes and Herbert week to week.

Buckner and your IDP scoring is the wildcard though. Probly need to elaborate there to get good answers.

[JoeJoe88]

1QB this is Pitts.

[Anteaters]

12tm 1qb, I'd waiver some with the total package of QB+Buckner but I think I'd go with Pitts.

In a 16tm league, I think the value of either QB is heightened a lot, as well as Buckner. Not just because of their value, but for what their addition could mean for the team you're trading to. And I'm not a guy who often considers how much the other team is boosted with a trade.

With you already having Hock, I really don't see the need for such a drastic move. I'm a little lower on Pitts than most because I don't project him to post WR1 stats on a regular basis. If you had a bum at TE, I could be talked into this. But I don't see a huge improvement from Hock to Pitts.

I like the idea of trading one of those QBs for quality but I'd much rather you use that capital to acquire a true WR1 instead of an incremental TE upgrade.

It's close enough either way that I don't think it's a bad trade. I just think you could make a different trade to make a better improvement to your team.

[Ghost Of Kevin White]

Wow. Thanks guys for all the insight. He wanted Irv Smith as part of the deal too. I had been holding onto him for 2 years and haven’t got to use him much. I went ahead and did this as I can also play a TE in my flex spot as well as a RB and WR. I love how young Pitts is and Hock, while good, has injury issues and QB problems.

[Buckhill Bombers]

I'd trade for Pitts

[lukkynumber13]

This isn’t a slam dunk easy deal but I think you did the right thing, getting Pitts.