Mack

[migouch99]

What's everyone's feeling towards Mack going forward? He's got some competition but is that role his now if he stays healthy?

Didn't realise he's 22. Thinking of making a move for Team 2 but not sure how to value him. The guy who owns him loves Sutton and with OBJ, Thomas, Cooper and Woods I feel pretty good there.

Worth a shot? How would you value Mack? and what (if any would you want with sutton for MM)?

[BradysBunch]

I was high on Mack when he came out. I still dont know what to think. Didnt Ind draft two RBs this last year? I would prefer Sutton over Mack personally. I think Mack side needs to add because I wouldnt sell Sutton for Mack. But I also had Sutton ranked as my #1 WR this year.

[jwb32]

Sutton long term. Mack just lit up the two worst teams in league. Now is not a good time to buy Mack.

[crip7300]

If you need RB help then I would have no problem making the move. Mack is a good young RB with a good athletic profile and has shown enough flashes to make me think he can be a top 10-15 RB in that offense moving forward. Just know that at some point, in the long run, you will probably wish you had Sutton, but if it strengthens your starting lineup and you can go on a few playoff runs because of it, I think its worth it.

[killer_of_giants]

Sutton long term. Mack just lit up the two worst teams in league. Now is not a good time to buy Mack.

this.
Mack had two good games, but that's about it. to be fair to him, his struggles last season may have been caused by Luck's absence and a terrible offensive line, but I don't think he's all that. RB2 for a couple of years.

[Dirty Mike&the Boys]

Sutton long term. Mack just lit up the two worst teams in league. Now is not a good time to buy Mack.

this.
Mack had two good games, but that's about it. to be fair to him, his struggles last season may have been caused by Luck's absence and a terrible offensive line, but I don't think he's all that. RB2 for a couple of years.

He was hurt last year also, but that's part of his problem. This guy always seems to be hurt, and in a position that is easily replaceable that is not a good thing. I am not a Sutton believer so I would rather keep him over obtaining Sutton, but I can see where people would think that's fair value and I have no issue with that. Mack is talented but injury is a major concern.

[Trevormortis]

I don't mind trading Sutton for Mack (maybe try and grab something on top). If he can get half of what hes doing now he'll still be great. Of course injuries are a concern, and in the long run you may wish you had Sutton still. But his explosiveness is not a fluke, just not sure how long he lasts.

[cvbuc]

I bought Mack and a 3rd for Rojo and a 2nd.

That's where I place his value.

[Dirty Mike&the Boys]

I bought Mack and a 3rd for Rojo and a 2nd.

That's where I place his value.

Rojo is worthless

[Trevormortis]

I bought Mack and a 3rd for Rojo and a 2nd.

That's where I place his value.

But I don't think that's his value.

[jwb32]

I bought Mack and a 3rd for Rojo and a 2nd.

That's where I place his value.

Was this before or after his 2 big games? I'm guessing before.

[Kelldon]

I think if he stays healthy the rest of year he will be the starter next year and will be worth a mid 1st possibly more. Indy drafted 2 rb's this year and Hines looks to be a solid receiving back so if Mack stays healthy and has a nice rest of season I don't see them spending any significant money or draft pick on another rb.

[Rasorin]

Regardless of opponent I think you have to take notice of Mack considering it’s a RB, in his second season with a a team wanting desperately for strong RB to arrive. Opportunity and production at RB is worth paying a Sutton like lottery ticket assuming you have position prefernence, which I do with WR .

Devonta Freeman 2.0 potential.

[jcc6fd]

RBs are expensive and this is about as cheap as one could expect to pay for an RB2 with upside for more.