offer for Lev Bell

[playa_hata]

so I have a deal on the table for team 1 in sig 12 team ppr superflex

I give: Cmc, Doctson, Goodwin, 2019 1st
I get: Leveon, 2019 2nd

not sure if its the right move deff makes my rbs better but leaves me with an even bigger ? at wr 3 which i know isnt that big of an issue and can find a way to make it work. if it was youre team would you be making the move to aquire bell? always seems easier to pick a side of a trade when youre not involved in the deal lol.

[Blueboy]

Seems to me like you're getting Bell for very cheap.

[FantasyFreak]

Absolutely. CMC is not a Running back. He's an offensive weapon.(LOL) The irony, as Bell views himself as that. Bell is a 3 down RB, CMC is a 3rd down back, slot receiver, etc. He is not a RB between the tackles at the NFL level IMO. You take Bell and the 2nd quite easily.

I view it as:

CMC, a 2nd , and 20019 first for Bell. Doctson and Goodwin are two seconds each, so take one off, and that's what you are left with. It's an elite RB and a 2nd for a bunch of unknowns and "potential". and a guy who's a gimmicky RB who caught a ton of balls last year.

[skip]

I expect McCaffrey is going to prove himself to be much more than the 3rd down back that he's getting labeled. But, he's not worth anything close to Bell and you're essentially just throwing in a first to make it happen.

[playa_hata]

even tho im so thin at wr to begin with?

[NFL-ons]

Dooo eeet!

[Kkiddynamite]

Do it before he changes his mind. Bell will more than make up for the drop off at WR3 and you can flip or spend the 2nd on a WR... Its buying Bell extremely cheap.

CMC is not going to evwr break out as a runner at the NFL level like people are predicting... hes a WR that lines up in the backfield. Hes not and wont be efficent wnough as a runner to be a 3 down back

[CurtisMyFavMartin]

Take that deal. If you’re desperate for depth, make a trade in the future, but you’re getting Bell for nice value.

[dhanks91]

Sure you could grab bell and flip him for more than your paying for him

[hockeyBjj]

Seems cheap for Bell

Get the big value side here, do other moves to make up for WR depth lack

You're losing Doctson and Goodwin, not like you're losing your D Adams to acquire Bell from your weaker than RB side WRs

[Dizzle]

You take that offer yesterday! I'd want Adams if I was giving up Bell. Bell is by far the best piece in that deal. You're getting a steal my friend.

[BigBawseRoss]

i would do it

[playa_hata]

bump to see what yall have to say post bell moves. i still havent made the deal

[Goddard]

I wouldn't worry about losing Doctson and Goodwin since that seems to be the only thing holding you back. You can probably find WRs like that off waivers at some point during the season to replace them. You also won't get a cheaper price for Bell than that, so I'd take that and not look back.