2016 League Discussion Thread
Moderator: TrueDawg
-
- All Pro
- Posts: 1921
- Joined: Sun Aug 02, 2015 7:18 pm
Re: 2016 League Discussion Thread
To my knowledge the only rule is only 1 D with more than 1 year contracts. I will wait for confirmation before making my drops.
Re: 2016 League Discussion Thread
Part of the reason we canned the PS squad was due to teams (MYSELF included here,, probably the leader of the pack)Teams would p/u D's store them on the the PS for a certain game, then activacte the PS D, then drop a D on there active roster. I have never seen three active D's on any roster since this league was formed, and I have been here since the formation of the league....I'll never forget I passed on Landian Tomilson for Duece McAliister in the first rookie draft...Multiple Scorgasms wrote:To my knowledge the only rule is only 1 D with more than 1 year contracts. I will wait for confirmation before making my drops.
Re: 2016 League Discussion Thread
Pretty sure the only limitation on defenses is that you can only have one with multiple years assigned.
I actually think I had three, for a week or two, once.
I actually think I had three, for a week or two, once.
Re: 2016 League Discussion Thread
One on the PS two on active roster yes, three on active never.Xulu Bak wrote:Pretty sure the only limitation on defenses is that you can only have one with multiple years assigned.
I actually think I had three, for a week or two, once.
Re: 2016 League Discussion Thread
The only rule limiting defenses is having only 1 with a multi-year deal.
If you want to waste additional roster spots on defenses....knock yourself out.
If you want to waste additional roster spots on defenses....knock yourself out.
Re: 2016 League Discussion Thread
TrueDawg wrote:The only rule limiting defenses is having only 1 with a multi-year deal.
If you want to waste additional roster spots on defenses....knock yourself out.
I don't remember it like that...but so be it
-
- All Pro
- Posts: 1921
- Joined: Sun Aug 02, 2015 7:18 pm
Re: 2016 League Discussion Thread
And Dr got Cobb too?
Jesus Christ. When does it end.
Jesus Christ. When does it end.
Re: 2016 League Discussion Thread
You would actually start Cobb? There are better WW wr's, well no, but Cobb is the ultimate 2 pts, or 20 pts WR...Multiple Scorgasms wrote:And Dr got Cobb too?
Jesus Christ. When does it end.
Re: 2016 League Discussion Thread
Kelce needs to find the endzone...twice.
-
- All Pro
- Posts: 1921
- Joined: Sun Aug 02, 2015 7:18 pm
Re: 2016 League Discussion Thread
In terms of pure football explosiveness, I would put Tyreek Hill up against any player I've seen in the last 15 years.
Re: 2016 League Discussion Thread
I didn't think you watched football? Just stats, and an occasional game?Multiple Scorgasms wrote:In terms of pure football explosiveness, I would put Tyreek Hill up against any player I've seen in the last 15 years.
Re: 2016 League Discussion Thread
He's quite a weapon...we'll see if he can keep it up as teams get more tape on him.Multiple Scorgasms wrote:In terms of pure football explosiveness, I would put Tyreek Hill up against any player I've seen in the last 15 years.
Re: 2016 League Discussion Thread
LOL a weapon he is
-
- All Pro
- Posts: 1921
- Joined: Sun Aug 02, 2015 7:18 pm
Re: 2016 League Discussion Thread
Still watch Red Zone every Sunday. Just about never tune in for full games. I would've for this but my internet has decided to act like we're in 1999.citsalp1 wrote:I didn't think you watched football? Just stats, and an occasional game?Multiple Scorgasms wrote:In terms of pure football explosiveness, I would put Tyreek Hill up against any player I've seen in the last 15 years.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 22 guests