Eddie Lacy or Thomas Rawls

[maxhyde]

I'll take Lacy by virtue of the fact that his only real competition for touches is James Starks.

Rawls may have a good season, but with Michael/Prosise/Collins nipping at his heels it's more likely he shares a lot more of the pie than Eddie does. And Eddie loves him some pie.

Agreed...on all points

[TomBobAnderson]

Fat Eddie Lacy for me

[thomasscheeks]

I'm kind of shocked this is even a discussion. I would take Lacy 10/10. Lacy is locked in for the next few years while Rawls could lose out to any joe off the street. I think CMikes success this offseason shows that the Seattle offense is just plain good and anyone could step in and make some plays.

This.

Everyone should be voting Lacy. lol

[Mefisto]

I'm kind of shocked this is even a discussion. I would take Lacy 10/10. Lacy is locked in for the next few years while Rawls could lose out to any joe off the street. I think CMikes success this offseason shows that the Seattle offense is just plain good and anyone could step in and make some plays.

This.

Everyone should be voting Lacy. lol

Yes, opposing viewpoints are not allowed!

Lacy is not locked in to anything. He is playing for that contract next year and should have a comeback year. However, I do see him relapsing after he gets a contract from a different team (I really don't see the Packers resigning him next year). His name and pedigree will likely keep his value afloat for a year or 2 afterwards but the numbers just won't be there. I do think that Rawls will post better numbers than him 2017 and beyond, but granted that is based on my gut.

I think the right move is to get Lacy now and trade him after this season. And then trade for Rawls next offseason.