Tannehill v 2013 rookie class

[hvacman]

Team in SIG.. thinking of using one of my late first rounders to draft Tanny in our upcoming rookie/fa draft. I dont see him making it back to me in the second if he even gets to me in the first. So I guess a better question is where would folks draft him if he was a rookie this year?

[MucBuc]

I'd draft him ahead of Manuel, who usually goes in the early-mid second round. So late first seems about right. He should be available there, cause some people put too much stock in first-year production and rather draft their shiny new rookie toy who will surely be a Pro Bowler as a rookie.

[sloth8u]

i like tannehill more than the qb's in this draft. i do think tyler wilson may be worth keeping a close eye on, but we likely wont know if he gets the job until after our drafts.

[dlf_jules]

For the team in your sig -- the eight-team league? Forget Tannehill or any other QB in the 1st. Give me a WR or RB who has long-term stud potential. Tavon/CP/Michael/Lacy types.

[eNdblu]

For the team in your sig -- the eight-team league? Forget Tannehill or any other QB in the 1st. Give me a WR or RB who has long-term stud potential. Tavon/CP/Michael/Lacy types.

This ^^
8 team league, I'm surprised it's not a 2QB + superflex league

[Never Veto1]

Considering the 3 QB's you have and this is an 8 team league with only one starting QB required, I wouldn't waste a roster spot on another QB. But if there was a gun to my head I would put it in this order: Manuel, Tannehill, Smith.....the rest

[holy_stromboli]

Considering the 3 QB's you have and this is an 8 team league with only one starting QB required, I wouldn't waste a roster spot on another QB. But if there was a gun to my head I would put it in this order: Manuel, Tannehill, Smith.....the rest

Wow, Manuel ahead of Tannehill. That's a first on these boards.

[Never Veto1]

Considering the 3 QB's you have and this is an 8 team league with only one starting QB required, I wouldn't waste a roster spot on another QB. But if there was a gun to my head I would put it in this order: Manuel, Tannehill, Smith.....the rest

Wow, Manuel ahead of Tannehill. That's a first on these boards.

I'm a huge fan of his capabilities, and he is a winner. Plus they have been stacking the offense to help him out. Has arguably a top 5 running game, so he won't have to do all the work, and he will get some time to learn and develop. I know it's a ballsy pick, but hey man, go big or go home

[MR ROURKE]

8 team league, I wouldn't want Tannehill or any 2013 rookie QB. They should all be on the WW except maybe EJ late in the draft.

[hvacman]

Thanks for the replies fellas. I'm just looking too far ahead I guess. Plus the fact that I have two late firsts and Manning retiring in the next 2-3 years, I must be over thinking things a bit.