Woods or Sutton

[hoos89]

I think by the end of 2019 it will be Sutton by a landslide.

It depends on your mindset. I'm rebuilding which makes it easily Sutton. Contenders would prefer Woods.
But I agree, if Sutton keeps progressing and the Rams keep all 3 WRs, most would lean Sutton at some point during 2019. (assuming at least one of Eman and DT are gone to pave the way for increased production opportunities)

I just have a hard time buying that even a rebuild should prefer to have a guy who we think might produce by the end of next season over a guy who is currently producing at a WR1 level (it'd be one thing if he was 30, but he's only 26). I'm kind of shocked by the results of this poll, honestly. Woods has done nothing but produce since I posted it and it's trended towards Sutton in that time after initially favoring Woods...which makes no sense. It's getting harder to dismiss his production as a fluke.

I think Woods should be considered a 4th round startup pick minimum, which seems like a hefty price to pay for Sutton to me.

[Dirty Mike&the Boys]

I think by the end of 2019 it will be Sutton by a landslide.

It depends on your mindset. I'm rebuilding which makes it easily Sutton. Contenders would prefer Woods.
But I agree, if Sutton keeps progressing and the Rams keep all 3 WRs, most would lean Sutton at some point during 2019. (assuming at least one of Eman and DT are gone to pave the way for increased production opportunities)

I just have a hard time buying that even a rebuild should prefer to have a guy who we think might produce by the end of next season over a guy who is currently producing at a WR1 level (it'd be one thing if he was 30, but he's only 26). I'm kind of shocked by the results of this poll, honestly. Woods has done nothing but produce since I posted it and it's trended towards Sutton in that time after initially favoring Woods...which makes no sense. It's getting harder to dismiss his production as a fluke.

I think Woods should be considered a 4th round startup pick minimum, which seems like a hefty price to pay for Sutton to me.

This poll is a joke, showing peoples 'rookie fever' is real. Woods in the WR6 in my ppr league currently. I'd laugh at someone if they offered me Sutton for Woods, regardless of if I was competitive or not.

[Jigga94]

This poll is a joke, showing peoples 'rookie fever' is real. Woods in the WR6 in my ppr league currently. I'd laugh at someone if they offered me Sutton for Woods, regardless of if I was competitive or not.

So much of this

[anovotny01]

I worry about Woods future, as I don't think he is long for LA. Sutton has potential and has looked solid in limited opportunities but he has QB questions. I could understand either way. On a rebuilding team I lean Sutton for the homerun potential because i can see him settling into a Woods type spot long term too.

[Dr. Trades]

Count me in the boat of those being truly shocked by the results of this poll. Someone would have to pay me a second rounder minimum to consider moving my Woods share right now for a guy named Sutton who was not even a top 2 or 3 WR of this weak WR class and who is still only in that "I think he might perform one day, some day, possibly, maybe..." gray area of unproven WR potential. Woods all day and this is not close at all imo, regardless of whether you think Sutton will be any good or not.

As a second point, I think this only validates how much of a steal Woods has been this year, and how crazy undervalued he is by the general fantasy community. He didn't have the name power coming from Buffalo, and on top of that people wrote him off after Cooks came to LA. All he's done this year is proven that he's arguably the WR1 in that offense whom Goff trusts most, and he's putting up legit top 5-10 WR numbers. I don't see any reason LA moves Woods anytime soon. If it ain't broke, don't fix it.

[hoos89]

I worry about Woods future, as I don't think he is long for LA. Sutton has potential and has looked solid in limited opportunities but he has QB questions. I could understand either way. On a rebuilding team I lean Sutton for the homerun potential because i can see him settling into a Woods type spot long term too.

So people don't want Woods because we speculatively think Woods is not long for the Rams, even though he's playing extremely well for them...seriously what is this based on? He's got 3 seasons left on his contract. It just seems like something someone on the forum posted once and then it got repeated to the point people just believe that to be true. And we do want Sutton because we speculatively think he's going to be a WR1 someday even though he hasn't really done anything yet, is buried on the depth chart and doesn't play in a great offense or with a plus QB?