Page 1 of 1

Bell vs. Evans

Posted: Tue Nov 21, 2017 1:46 pm
by NY CAT
Whom would you rather have in dynasty?

Why?

Re: Bell vs. Evans

Posted: Wed Nov 22, 2017 7:38 am
by psu007
Bell just has the feel of a guy who's body won't hold up to the beating it takes. Evans will outlast by a good few seasons. If you're asking right now and next season, Bell easily.

Re: Bell vs. Evans

Posted: Wed Nov 22, 2017 7:47 am
by whodunnit
I know I'm likely in the minority, but for me it's Bell. Usually I choose WR over RB, but not in this case.

Re: Bell vs. Evans

Posted: Thu Nov 23, 2017 10:42 am
by nathanq42
Out of contention I'd take Evans easily
If I got a shot I'd take Bell

Re: Bell vs. Evans

Posted: Sat Nov 25, 2017 2:04 am
by Samhain34
nathanq42 wrote: ā†‘Thu Nov 23, 2017 10:42 am Out of contention I'd take Evans easily
If I got a shot I'd take Bell
Exactly.

Also, questions like this is why it pays to have your team in your signature, since my roster composition would dictate which one I would take.

Re: Bell vs. Evans

Posted: Sun Nov 26, 2017 7:51 am
by Tvols
Going bell I think 2 to 3 years ahead in dynasty and Iā€™m not a Winston fan at all.. he looks terrible most of the time ..

Re: Bell vs. Evans

Posted: Mon Nov 27, 2017 11:18 am
by Goddard
Most people had Evans as their 1.01 or 1.02 in startups, so I'm assuming he still holds more dynasty value than Bell. However, if you're only looking ahead for the next 2-3 years, I think Bell is the much safer bet.

Re: Bell vs. Evans

Posted: Tue Nov 28, 2017 8:35 am
by BigBawseRoss
just traded away Evans for Bell in a 16 team dynasty. Bells volume is undeniable and Evans just is not getting any monster games this season. Evans will be useful for a longer time i would say but the high level production for the shorter time with Bell will make it easier to compete

Re: Bell vs. Evans

Posted: Mon Dec 04, 2017 3:00 am
by hjernazian
Goddard wrote: ā†‘Mon Nov 27, 2017 11:18 am Most people had Evans as their 1.01 or 1.02 in startups, so I'm assuming he still holds more dynasty value than Bell. However, if you're only looking ahead for the next 2-3 years, I think Bell is the much safer bet.
you're right, but we can't predict what the climate will be like 2-3 years down the line. what we can predict, is bell (unless he smokes more herb and gets suspend *lock up conner for a 3rd rounder if you make this deal*) will undoubtably kill it. winston and that entire offense is ? to me... I'd rather have bell if I have a WR3 in place to start over Evans/or if he is not my only WR hope.