Golden Tate or 1.10-TWill?
Re: Golden Tate or 1.10-TWill?
^All valid points Sugbear. I will just change one thing, Calvin turns 30 this season and Tate turns 27. They are three years apart.
Re: Golden Tate or 1.10-TWill?
Well I did say I would only use numbers that support my side, and technically AT THE START OF THIS SEASON, Calvin will be 29 and Tate 27 I'm not real sure why I feel the need to post all this though, I'll never begrudge anyone on their rankings and I get the Tate support. I guess it's cause I'm on an island on this one, and it's no fun being alonevi29 wrote:^All valid points Sugbear. I will just change one thing, Calvin turns 30 this season and Tate turns 27. They are three years apart.
- Franky Four Fingers
- Starter
- Posts: 546
- Joined: Sun Feb 15, 2015 11:48 am
Re: Golden Tate or 1.10-TWill?
I have to agree with sugbear on this one. Golden Tate is not a bad player by any means but T-Will & 1.10 is just more than I would be willing to pay. If you had multiple 1st round picks I could see this being a different story but you are giving up your top rookie pick and a younger wr to get the num2 Detroit wr. If you really like Tate I guess go for it but that's more than I would be willing to pay.
Re: Golden Tate or 1.10-TWill?
Appreciate all the responses guys. Got a variation of it as well.
Give 1.10, M. Bryant, R. Rodgers
Get Golden Tate, Black Unicorn.
Give 1.10, M. Bryant, R. Rodgers
Get Golden Tate, Black Unicorn.
-
- Rookie
- Posts: 77
- Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2015 1:03 am
Re: Golden Tate or 1.10-TWill?
Black Unicorn?Mullmania wrote:Appreciate all the responses guys. Got a variation of it as well.
Give 1.10, M. Bryant, R. Rodgers
Get Golden Tate, Black Unicorn.
Bryant may have Wheaton to deal with...Rodgers may have a TE drafted to deal with ....1.10....not anyone spectacular.
Re: Golden Tate or 1.10-TWill?
M. Bennettjackhammer23 wrote:Black Unicorn?Mullmania wrote:Appreciate all the responses guys. Got a variation of it as well.
Give 1.10, M. Bryant, R. Rodgers
Get Golden Tate, Black Unicorn.
Bryant may have Wheaton to deal with...Rodgers may have a TE drafted to deal with ....1.10....not anyone spectacular.
-
- Rookie
- Posts: 77
- Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2015 1:03 am
Re: Golden Tate or 1.10-TWill?
Bennett will be a beast this year with Marshall gone. Easy win Bennett Tate side.Mullmania wrote:M. Bennettjackhammer23 wrote:Black Unicorn?Mullmania wrote:Appreciate all the responses guys. Got a variation of it as well.
Give 1.10, M. Bryant, R. Rodgers
Get Golden Tate, Black Unicorn.
Bryant may have Wheaton to deal with...Rodgers may have a TE drafted to deal with ....1.10....not anyone spectacular.
-
- Practice Squad
- Posts: 120
- Joined: Mon Jul 01, 2013 6:59 am
Re: Golden Tate or 1.10-TWill?
last year Jordan Mathews and Allen Robinson were 1.10 type of guys. Would you consider tate over them? I would not. Just do some research and don't make a bad pick.
12 team, PPR Superflex, 1.5 TE premium, 6pt TDs, QB/RB/2WR/TE/3 Flex
Your Dad - 2015, 2017, 2018, & 2019 champion
QB: Mahomes, Watson, Roethlisberger, Rudolph, Brissett
RB: Barkley, Freeman, Coleman, Hunt, Lindsay, Thompson, Bonnafon, Homer
WR: Tyreek, Evans, Godwin, Ridley, Sutton, Pascal, Johnson, Gage, Stills
TE: Kelce, Andrews, Gesicki,
No picks - Always trade them for players
Win a lot. Lose more.
Your Dad - 2015, 2017, 2018, & 2019 champion
QB: Mahomes, Watson, Roethlisberger, Rudolph, Brissett
RB: Barkley, Freeman, Coleman, Hunt, Lindsay, Thompson, Bonnafon, Homer
WR: Tyreek, Evans, Godwin, Ridley, Sutton, Pascal, Johnson, Gage, Stills
TE: Kelce, Andrews, Gesicki,
No picks - Always trade them for players
Win a lot. Lose more.
-
- Rookie
- Posts: 77
- Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2015 1:03 am
Re: Golden Tate or 1.10-TWill?
Matthews went 4-7 in most of the leagues I am in. Tate had like 250 plus points last year...and Robinson really didn't do anything before he was injured.doombringer wrote:last year Jordan Mathews and Allen Robinson were 1.10 type of guys. Would you consider tate over them? I would not. Just do some research and don't make a bad pick.
Re: Golden Tate or 1.10-TWill?
Any other thoughts. Besides which side would you take do you think this improves my team?
Eli, Kap
Charles-Davis, Ingram-Khiry, Bush, Cadet
Calvin, Sanders, Roddy, Wright, Crabtree, Twill, Hawkins
Gates-Green, Eifert, Cook
Taxi- M. Bryant, R. Rodgers, PRich, 1.10, 3.10
Is starting Bennett that much of an upgrade of Gates? Probably a little bit.
Tate over Wright or Roddy? Probably a little bit.
It totally clears out of my taxi though. No Bryant or 1st round rookie...
Eli, Kap
Charles-Davis, Ingram-Khiry, Bush, Cadet
Calvin, Sanders, Roddy, Wright, Crabtree, Twill, Hawkins
Gates-Green, Eifert, Cook
Taxi- M. Bryant, R. Rodgers, PRich, 1.10, 3.10
Is starting Bennett that much of an upgrade of Gates? Probably a little bit.
Tate over Wright or Roddy? Probably a little bit.
It totally clears out of my taxi though. No Bryant or 1st round rookie...
-
- Rookie
- Posts: 77
- Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2015 1:03 am
Re: Golden Tate or 1.10-TWill?
Mullmania wrote:Any other thoughts. Besides which side would you take do you think this improves my team?
Eli, Kap
Charles-Davis, Ingram-Khiry, Bush, Cadet
Calvin, Sanders, Roddy, Wright, Crabtree, Twill, Hawkins
Gates-Green, Eifert, Cook
Taxi- M. Bryant, R. Rodgers, PRich, 1.10, 3.10
Is starting Bennett that much of an upgrade of Gates? Probably a little bit.
Tate over Wright or Roddy? Probably a little bit.
It totally clears out of my taxi though. No Bryant or 1st round rookie...
I would definitely start Tate over White and Wright.
I think these two players are good for the playoff/championship push for your team.
Rodgers will have to compete for targets with Nelson, Cobb, Adams, and Lacy, the 10 pick is a crap shoot, Bryant has talent but also has competition from Wheaton for catches.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 52 guests