Give Evan's and 1.08 for Hopkins

[zarathustra]

Standard scoring

[vixen]

if Hopkins is your guy, then get him...it is a bit much for me...but probably what it will take
but, admittedly, i do not play in any standard scoring leagues, so i am not sure of the disparity between the two players

[FantasyFreak]

I'd take the Evans side. In standard Evans is almost equal to Hopkins. He's a bit younger, too.

[Edgy68]

I love Hopkins compared to Evans, but I don't think the gap is the 1.08. I agree there would have to be an incentive for someone to trade off Hopkins. Have you tried a lesser pick or a player?

[FantasyFreak]

In standard scoring, Evans finished 14 points below Hopkins. SO, less than 1 PPG. Not giving up a first on top. The difference is so marginal, you really should not need to give up much of anything on top IMO.

[Gator Sens]

Too much for me but if you want Hopkins, you will have to overpay.

[BigBawseRoss]

looks good

[The.Big.Spank]

I might try that in my league, but its a PPR. If I was a Hopkins owner I would probably decline, and you would be (rightfully) pissed, but it would take an offer like that for me to even consider trading Hopkins.

[WhatWouldDitkaDo]

Gimme Hopkins. Evans is great, but even with Arians there now, I have little faith in Winston or TB as an organization. The 1.08 is a fairly cheap price to pay to get that WR upgrade.

[hockeyBjj]

Value wise seems fair. Will come down to personal preference on if Hopkins is worth that over Evans, and your own valuations of the guys. I can see either side in this one

[Goddard]

I probably wouldn't move Hopkins for that, but I also wouldn't pay that if I was an Evans owner.

[saw061600]

Keeping Evans in standard scoring. Hopkins scored less than 15 points more than Evans; no way less than 1 point a week is worth the 1.08.

[frisco86]

we look to make our teams better. 1.08 is a crapshoot. Hopkins is better than Evans. Love me Evans but Hopkins is better. It makes your team better. Do it.