Barkley deal

[Luke7799]

My team:

QB: Rosen, Beathard
RB: Barkely, Michel, Mixon, Guice, Gio B, Burkhead, Foreman, Alf Morris
WR: Robby Anderson, K Cole, DJ Moore, Allison, Enunwa, Tawyon Taylor (other various lotto types)
TE : Njoku, J Smith

I took this team over last year and the draft just fell to me taking a bunch of RB's as WR's went earlier than expected.

I have an offer on the table for Barkley.

I give Barkley
I get: K Allen, Josh Gordon, Courtland Sutton, and a mid 1

This would give me 3 1sts all project mid to early for next year as well.

I think it may be a little light for Barkley but may serve my team better in the long term

[Russty84]

I don't think it's bad value. However, i don't think you need to make this move. Build around that young core of RBs and try to package a WR with Gio to get the upgrade at WR.

[lukkyseven]

I can't speak of the trade as I'm just not sure. But what Russty said. Keep those RB's, next year is a WR heavy draft. You have some firsts already. See what your team looks like after next years draft. I doubt Barkley's value is changing that much in that time frame.

[killer_of_giants]

I think it may be a little light for Barkley but may serve my team better in the long term

unlikely.
Keenan is good, Sutton is a very nice prospect, Gordon has low value (for me at least...). but Barkley kicks arse and it's his first season!
Sure there's a 1st rounder included but you already have two.

a balanced team with no studs is unlikely to get you anywhere.
either get more out of Barkley, or use a different rebuilding strategy.

[crip7300]

Keep Barkley, the value is decent but Barkley is almost irreplaceable. Getting a young Top 5 bellcow RB is almost impossible, it would have to be a clear win and massive overpay for me to give him up, this is not that.

[badbuddah]

I'd have to give my entire starting lineup for Barkley in my league! He is a top 3 RB already and is extremely young, hang on to him! He is one of the three most valuable players in dynasty right now. I'd try to build around him unless you get something really insane.

[BigBawseRoss]

id take that package for barkley. allen and a first should be enough.

id ask for a rb rather than gordon tho

[BelichekYourSelf]

I agree with everything said above. To trade Barkley at this point it would have to be an INSANE overpay. This is decent but nowhere close to what it would take to move Barkley. Keep him unless you get an offer you cannot refuse.

[Trevormortis]

id take that package for barkley. allen and a first should be enough.

id ask for a rb rather than gordon tho

Strongly disagree with this. I wouldn't take the package stated by the OP, yet alone this.

[bills2]

Value is probably close, but like people have said above me Barkley along with your other young RBs are perfect to build this team around. Throw in those firsts you have, you can grab some WRs and watch your team grow. If you find you need more WR's you could always move a different RB next year once your roster shakes out a bit more. I'm very high on Sutton too.

Barkley might be the #1 pick in start ups next year. I would need a crazy offer to even consider moving him.

[Mjvb5]

uhhhh is Keenan's value that low now, I mean I've been low on him but I'd buy him if it's this
I'd take that for my Barkley share

[Goddard]

Replace Gordon with something better and take the offer.

[Luke7799]

Thank you all for the input, I am going to ride it out with Barkley and make some moves after the season

[Dirty Mike&the Boys]

Man, with that team I would stay put. Lots of solid WR's coming out this year, and your RB situation is set for years to come. I don't like that value for Barkley anyways. Like Goddard suggested, if you're going to pull the trigger on the proposed deal, Gordon needs to be swapped with a better established player. Barkley is a top 5 RB and those aren't replaceable.

[bills2]

uhhhh is Keenan's value that low now, I mean I've been low on him but I'd buy him if it's this
I'd take that for my Barkley share

I'm not real high on Keenan, could just be me though.