New Offer: Michel/MWilliams for Keenan (Old: Golladay/1st for Thielen)

[nosferatu]

Copying my comment from below -

UPDATE: The owner who offered the trade just reversed course, pulled back the offer and made a new one that I find quite a bit more intriguing.

I give: Michel, MWilliams
I get: K. Allen

In a vacuum, I'd take Allen, but I would need to acquire another RB. The bottom teams surprisingly have some of the best RBs and they're available: Hunt, Zeke, Gordon, Johnson, Bell. Is it advisable to make a move that requires another move? My team is holding in 1st with the most points scored as is. I'm not sure of the price to acquire someone of Michel's caliber to replace him.
____________________________________

For team B, PPR. I love me some Thielen, but I haven't clicked accept. Golladay's arrow continues to point up, and he's 4 years younger. Stand pat?

Give: Golladay, 2019 1st (likely late)
Get: Thielen

[Dirty Mike&the Boys]

I find them pretty equal at this stage, so I wouldn't add a first to the Golladay side. This would be buying Thielen really high imo. His age is a huge factor for me.

[WhatWouldDitkaDo]

Man that's really tough. I love Golladay, but Thielen will likely be a slightly better piece for a contender this year. If you get Thielen, then you have to go all in and upgrade your RB3 and TE too with 2019/2020 picks.

[jwb32]

I'd add a 2nd but I don't think I could part with a 1st here.

[Goddard]

Value seems fair, just not sure you really need Thielen. I'd probably keep the youth, or at least try to use it on someone a little younger.

[Space Cowboy]

Maybe the Thielen side can add round 2.

[notweswelker]

Because of age Thielen = Golladay.
No way I'm adding a first there.

[nosferatu]

I agree with all the sentiment here. I think the other owner adding a 2nd would make it closer for me, but doesn't really do that much for my team and Golladay is 4 years younger.

----

UPDATE: The owner who offered the trade just reversed course, pulled back the offer and made a new one that I find quite a bit more intriguing.

I give: Michel, MWilliams
I get: K. Allen

In a vacuum, I'd take Allen, but I would need to acquire another RB. The bottom teams surprisingly have some of the best RBs and they're available: Hunt, Zeke, Gordon, Johnson, Bell. Is it advisable to make a move that requires another move? My team is holding in 1st with the most points scored as is.

[BigBawseRoss]

go get allen before that deal is gone too

[nosferatu]

go get allen before that deal is gone too

Too good of a deal? Puts my team in an odd spot at RB.