Kelce/RoJo/Barber or Cook/Chubb/Njoku/2nd ~POLL~

This is the place for team advice - should I make this trade, should I draft that player, etc.

Which side?

Kelce/RoJo/Barber
1
6%
Cook/Chubb/Njoku/2nd
15
94%
 
Total votes: 16

User avatar
BelichekYourSelf
Hall of Fame
Hall of Fame
Posts: 4687
Joined: Mon Mar 02, 2015 10:49 am
Location: Virginia

Kelce/RoJo/Barber or Cook/Chubb/Njoku/2nd ~POLL~

Postby BelichekYourSelf » Thu Sep 06, 2018 3:02 pm

Team 2 in my sig. Players becomes FA's available to entire league for bidding when their contracts expire.

Other owner involved in the trade will be reading this as well. Both teams are top competitors for title this year. I need RB depth he needs a TE upgrade.

PPR, TE Prem (1.5 PPR)

Kelce (3 $24), RoJo (5 $21), Barber (3 $20)
or
Cook (4 $21), Chubb (5 $17), Njoku (2 $17), 2019 2nd

Which side has more value?
12 Team. Roster 22, 4 TS. PPR, TE Prem (1.75). Start 1 QB, 5 flex (2 RB Max), 1 Def, 1 K
QB P. Mahomes, J. Goff, B Zappe (TS)
RB S. Barkley, N. Chubb, R. Stevenson, T. Pollard, J. Cook, K. Herbert, A. Mattison, E. Mitchell
WR AJ Brown, DK Metcalf, C. Kupp, A. Cooper, D. Hopkins, DJ Moore, B. Aiyuk, R. Doubs, K. Boutte (TS), C. Tillman (TS), M. Wilson (TS)
TE M. Andrews
Def Patriots, Ravens

User avatar
Goddard
GOAT
GOAT
Posts: 27771
Joined: Wed Feb 15, 2017 9:21 am

Re: Kelce/RoJo/Barber or Cook/Chubb/Njoku/2nd ~POLL~

Postby Goddard » Thu Sep 06, 2018 3:05 pm

Kelce and Cook are close, and might even lean Cook because of the better contract. The rest of the deal isn't very close. I'd much rather have Chubb, Njoku, and a 2nd over Rojo and Barber.

User avatar
NFL-ons
Pro Bowler
Pro Bowler
Posts: 1263
Joined: Tue Dec 16, 2014 7:34 pm

Re: Kelce/RoJo/Barber or Cook/Chubb/Njoku/2nd ~POLL~

Postby NFL-ons » Thu Sep 06, 2018 3:31 pm

Cook side. Killing it!

topher
All Pro
All Pro
Posts: 1576
Joined: Tue May 23, 2017 4:34 pm

Re: Kelce/RoJo/Barber or Cook/Chubb/Njoku/2nd ~POLL~

Postby topher » Thu Sep 06, 2018 6:01 pm

I'd rather Kelce over Cook by a bit, but it ends there for that side, much rather have the other side for the rest.


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Anteaters, Google [Bot], sconnie21 and 32 guests