Would you accept Saquon for Michael Thomas?

[JPP's10thfinger]

I'm saquon side. I think it's fair as is but i think I can squeeze a bit more out of the Thomas owner.

[Missile]

I offered Thomas for 1.01 before a draft where I needed help at RB and was strong at WR (only reason I did). Offer was rejected. I think it’s fair and I lean towards MT. There is no way I’d add anything to him to get Barkley.

[tom14cat14]

Looking at ADP it would be Barkley. Based on value I see on him it would take MT plus. I had 1 share of Barkley I ended up getting OBJ, J. Howard and his 2019 1st (late) for Barkley and Baldwin. I like the idea of turning risk of a still an unknown rookie for proven player. So I would try to get a little more on top. Because you can justify by multiple ways.

[mrmagloo]

I am not trading MT for Barkley. Too speculative unless I have a stacked core of WR and no one at RB.

[Slackalacker]

I’d take MT over Barkley, unless your team was drastically stacked in one direction.

[Titans95]

Barkley has higher upside than MT and most people value RB's more than WR's so Yeah I'd take Barkley.

[TrashPanda]

Depends on league scoring and if you needed a rb or wr more. But just based purely on value I’d say Barkley. His value is high right now but let him have a couple good games and his value will skyrocket

[notweswelker]

Depends on league scoring and if you needed a rb or wr more. But just based purely on value I’d say Barkley. His value is high right now but let him have a couple good games and his value will skyrocket

I agree with this. Barks for me

[Missile]

Depends on league scoring and if you needed a rb or wr more. But just based purely on value I’d say Barkley. His value is high right now but let him have a couple good games and his value will skyrocket

He is a rookie with current ADP of 5. His couple of good games are already embedded in this value. Only place I see his value going is down.

[slaughterrt]

You guys are crazy. Thomas every day of the week. Barkley hasn’t even played a snap of meaningful NFL football. Yes, his value is through the roof, but his value isn’t going to go anywhere but down from this point.

[Titans95]

You guys are crazy. Thomas every day of the week. Barkley hasn’t even played a snap of meaningful NFL football. Yes, his value is through the roof, but his value isn’t going to go anywhere but down from this point.

And if he has a top 5 fantasy finish? A 22 year old heading in his sophomore season in a pat Shurmur offense will probably catapult him in front of Bell/DJ and become the RB3. If he beats out Zeke and Gurley then he becomes the 1.01 in dynasty.

[hockeyBjj]

Michael Thomas for me

Damn tho, why can't I get these offers for my Barkley share?

[BigBawseRoss]

BARKLEY not close for me. think he has better potential to score a lot more points. simple as that. people talking about values going up or down from here are not looking to win they are looking to get the "best assets". Barkley has the top point potential of these 2 players and is obviously very young, we all also know rb points are much harder to come by/replace than WR points.

[esloan35]

Michael Thomas for me

Damn tho, why can't I get these offers for my Barkley share?

I agree! But MT is the S#@T

[WhatWouldDitkaDo]

I see it as:

Thomas > Barkley in PPR
Thomas >= Barkley in non-PPR