Kenny Golladay for Marlon Mack and Tyler Eifert, pick a side

[UATahoe]

So I actually got my deal finalized and accepted for Diggs and Miller. The same owner has Eifert and Mack. I actually liked what I saw from Mack last year and the fact Luck seems to be returning. Eifert is a complete shot in the dark and more than likely unusable but though he would be worth the throw in. Thoughts? I have been high on Golladay and this seems to be selling a little short. Interested to see what you guys think.

[mariettajeff]

You can get a starting RB, for at best the 3rd option at receiver. I like Golladay, and might do this for the future, but in a vacuum, I take the starter.

[UATahoe]

So you like the Mack side?

[mariettajeff]

Yes

[Kkiddynamite]

I actually prefer Golladay... Even being the 3rd option at the moment you know what you’re getting. Det should throw it a lot and I think a lot of Ebrons targets will go to Golladay, and there is room for him to grow. Mack had his moments, but they drafted Hines and Wilkins and have gone on record multiple times saying it will be a RBBC, also very good chance they pursue a big FA or draft somebody early next year. Eifert cant stay on the field to save his life and is on a 1 year deal and if he misses any time at all hes unlikely to find a long term deal anywhere and could be forced to retire. Ill take Golladay all day

[HughHoney]

Golladay for me

[UATahoe]

Yea, I think the more I look at the long term, I am leaning to keeping Golladay.

[M-Dub]

Seems pretty even. Would come down to team need.

[UATahoe]

My team is in desperate need of Rb futures but I do question whether Mack fits that bill. Definitely seems to be a divided opinion on him. I would be open to other Rb targets as well that I should possibly look at.

[Space Cowboy]

Even deal. Depends on team structure but talent wise I'm going golladay.

[UATahoe]

So for team 1 in my signature and my Rb situation, would you take the gamble or just hold Golladay for the WR1 upside?

[Space Cowboy]

You're not deep at WR and I think sanders enters the downside of his career. Mack may end up being third behind Hines and Wilkins.

Every year we have Paul Perkins, Matt jones, ty Montgomery, mike gillisele.....just because a starter doesn't mean he's worth going after.

[UATahoe]

Agree on the starter carousel for sure.

[Kkiddynamite]

You're not deep at WR and I think sanders enters the downside of his career. Mack may end up being third behind Hines and Wilkins.

Every year we have Paul Perkins, Matt jones, ty Montgomery, mike gillisele.....just because a starter doesn't mean he's worth going after.

Agree you arent deep, but you arent hurting either. Id wait until in season and package Sanders/Hurns or Sanders/Godwin for a diff RB than Mack... Sanders will be decent w Keenum but is likely out of Den next year and on the down slide of his career. Godwin will end up as the WR2 in TB but Evans will always be a target hog and there is Brate/OJ there as well... Hurns might be the de facto WR1 but Im not expecting better numbers than what Dez posted last year. Not elite, but not terrible either.

[UATahoe]

Yea, i wouldn't say I am deep but I do feel good with group I have put together. Definitely agree that an in season move may net better quality once some guys start putting up numbers. I feel really confident with my top 5 wr's and hopefully I can start focusing on shoring up my Rb depth. TE will admittedly be the last priority but it definitely needs attention as well.