1.2 for 1.6 + 1.11? (Poll included)

[joshb]

For my team in sig I have an offer for the 1.2. Value wise it seems fine to me, but my roster is devoid of running backs. I'm leaning towards sticking with the 1.2 and taking Guice or Penny. Thoughts?

[Jmatt>Coleman]

Non superflex non excited about pick 1.11. You don’t need a back end wr. I would stay put at 1.2 and get your favorite rb. Alternatively if you don’t have a favorite and could move 1.11 for a rb vet and grab a rb at 1.6 that might not be a bad move.

[Goddard]

Keep the 1.02 and take Guice.

[FantasyFreak]

Keep the 1.02 and take Guice.

I'll counter. Keep the 1.02 and take Penny. In all seriousness though, it really depends on how you value the RB's at the top of the board. I have seen DJ Moore and Sutton fall to 1.11, so if you don't have a huge value drop between say Penny/Guice/Chubb/Michel, vs. Freeman and Rojo, then the trade makes sense. If you are like me, or Goddard (different player, but same idea), that think there is a clear difference at the 1.02, keep it and take your guy.

[bwhauf]

I don't see a big difference between Guice/Penny/Chubb/Michel/Rojo so I'd take the picks. Then I'd try to trade up to the 1.08 and get Freeman or Johnson

[FantasyFreak]

I don't see a big difference between Guice/Penny/Chubb/Michel/Rojo so I'd take the picks. Then I'd try to trade up to the 1.08 and get Freeman or Johnson

Yeah, forgot about him in my post.

[dblj1199]

If you have the 2.2 the only way I’m making this is if I have a second deal in place to package the 1.11 and 2.2 to get back up to the mid first. I’m most likely keeping the 1.2.