1.01 is easy, but what to do with 2.01?

[Belichickians]

Moore>Ridley>Kirk>rest

[hudini33]

Moore>Ridley>Kirk>rest

He was assuming Moore and Ridley were gone. As well as Sutton. So o guess you're saying Kirk?

[Belichickians]

Moore>Ridley>Kirk>rest

He was assuming Moore and Ridley were gone. As well as Sutton. So o guess you're saying Kirk?

Correct

[Vick2Crumpler87]

Moore>Ridley>Kirk>rest

IMO, its Ridley>Moore>Sutton

Ive had that mindset since before the draft and imnot wavering on it. Ridley is gonna be a beast and I was hyped when ATL got him

[Belichickians]

Moore>Ridley>Kirk>rest

IMO, its Ridley>Moore>Sutton

Ive had that mindset since before the draft and imnot wavering on it. Ridley is gonna be a beast and I was hyped when ATL got him

I guess that’s the beauty of fantasy! A lot of varying opinions!

[Vick2Crumpler87]

Moore>Ridley>Kirk>rest

IMO, its Ridley>Moore>Sutton

Ive had that mindset since before the draft and imnot wavering on it. Ridley is gonna be a beast and I was hyped when ATL got him

I guess that’s the beauty of fantasy! A lot of varying opinions!

Very true

[vixen]

8RBs, 9. Moore 10. Ridley....those are the usually top 10..pick your order.
then Sutton/Kirk/Miller...pick your order....so, take whichever one is available out of those

[colonnaj94]

Hello! I have a rookie draft coming up and was looking for some input. I have the 1.01, which is possibly the easiest pick ever, but I'm perplexed on the 2.01. The top 8 rb’s should be gone, so that initially leaves me looking at wide receiver to start the 2nd round.

Assuming that Moore, Ridley and Sutton are gone, that leaves a grouping of Kirk, Gallup, Washington, Miller and Pettis to choose from. I'm not in love with any of those options, or at least in love with the idea that I'll end up picking the one that's the next JuJu and not the one who's the next Zay Jones.

Should I consider reaching for Ballage or Hynes, being confident that they won't be there at 3.01? If I do that, I would always have the chance that someone like Chark falls to the 3.01 if I want to take a chance on a 2nd round (drafted) wide receiver.

Obviously trading down is always a nice value option, but unless a league-mate has a definite preference for one of the guys that I mentioned above, I can't imagine that I'd be able to move done a few spots while picking up much more than a future 4th at best.

My other thought is to trade the 2.01 outright for a player so if anyone has done the same and gotten a good return, please let me know!

Appreciate the feedback in advance!

-James

Miller, Gallup, Kirk, Washington is howI would rank them

If you want Ballage or Hynes, just trade down. Don't reach

[Hindsy]

I was offered Randall Cobb straight up for my 2.01 the other day. Wasnt sure how I felt on that one...

[ajfst15]

Thanks everyone!

Below are three potential trades that I may be able to swing:

2.01 for 2.09 and Corey Coleman (no way I'd trade 2.01 straight-up for CoCo!)
2.01 for 2.07 and 3.07 (or 2.01 for John Ross and 3.07 to the same owner)
2.01 for 2.06 and 3.06.

I would probably have to add a small piece like 4.01 or a guy far down my bench to make these happen. Do any of them look interesting?

[chalorpas]

8RBs, 9. Moore 10. Ridley....those are the usually top 10..pick your order.
then Sutton/Kirk/Miller...pick your order....so, take whichever one is available out of those

Yep, this is good advice. I'd probably just stick with 2.01 instead of trading it.