Draft Help @ 1.03

[playa_hata]

regardless of what everyone is saying take guice and dont over think it

[bills2]

regardless of what everyone is saying take guice and dont over think it

x2

And thank the person who passed on him at 1.02

[Goddard]

I wouldn't have made that trade and think you lost big, but what's done is done. As for the pick, you have to take Guice here. And Rojo at 1.02? What's that guy thinking?

[PercyR1]

Simple for me. Get Penny if you can then next go Rojo then guice

Penny>Rojo>guice>Sony>Freeman>chubb

[vixen]

i would have kept freeman and 1.03...
not much difference between 1.03 and 1.05 to me

i would take Guice or Chubb

[JDogil12]

Between those 2, I would personally go with Michel, as I liken his 2018 to Dion Lewis last year. Follow the draft capital, the Pats wouldnt do something stupid like taking a running back in the first without the full intention he will lead their team.
I personally prefer Penny and think that the offensive line concerns are overblown, but michel between those two.

[Titans95]

Not Michel. He is not a ppr back, Guice had more receptions than him last year.

I can't tell if this is a joke

Look it up. Michel hardly caught or had passes thrown his way. Thats why the Kamara comp is so lame.

To the OP. Grab Penny if hes available. If hes gone grab Guice. Oh and ditch that league with its stupid scoring system.

Guice:
Yr 1: 5 receptions, 20 yards
Yr 2: 9 receptions, 106 yards
Yr 3: 18 receptions, 124 yards

Michel:
Yr 1: 7 receptions, 106 yards
Yr 2: 26 receptions, 270 yards
Yr 3: 22 receptions, 149 yards
Yr 4: 9 receptions, 96 yards

neither one of them had a ton of receptions in college and I blame that mostly on scheme as I think Guice is an underrated receiver but I also can tell you that Michels stats are better, his efficiency is better, and just about every "analyst" thinks his receiving skills are superior to Guice's. Only time will tell but I'm putting my money on Michel to have twice the amount of receptions guice does his rookie year and consistently more than him throughout their careers. I agree I think the Kamara comp is lazy and mainly stems from them both being extremely effective without being considered the "lead back". I feel you on the Penny comment though, in my ppr leagues my rankings have been Penny,Michel, Guice.

[Bot101]

I can't tell if this is a joke

Look it up. Michel hardly caught or had passes thrown his way. Thats why the Kamara comp is so lame.

To the OP. Grab Penny if hes available. If hes gone grab Guice. Oh and ditch that league with its stupid scoring system.

Guice:
Yr 1: 5 receptions, 20 yards
Yr 2: 9 receptions, 106 yards
Yr 3: 18 receptions, 124 yards

Michel:
Yr 1: 7 receptions, 106 yards
Yr 2: 26 receptions, 270 yards
Yr 3: 22 receptions, 149 yards
Yr 4: 9 receptions, 96 yards

neither one of them had a ton of receptions in college and I blame that mostly on scheme as I think Guice is an underrated receiver but I also can tell you that Michels stats are better, his efficiency is better, and just about every "analyst" thinks his receiving skills are superior to Guice's. Only time will tell but I'm putting my money on Michel to have twice the amount of receptions guice does his rookie year and consistently more than him throughout their careers. I agree I think the Kamara comp is lazy and mainly stems from them both being extremely effective without being considered the "lead back". I feel you on the Penny comment though, in my ppr leagues my rankings have been Penny,Michel, Guice.

Yes but he was specifically talking about last season when Michel only caught 9 passes and Guice caught 18. I think both can catch just fine.