Rate this trade, worth a Veto?

[Mints]

A Hogan, Crabtree and 1.11 for Julio Jones trade was proposed in our league and I'm shocked by the value and I don't value Jones highly at this stage of his career. This was shocking though...

[hockeyBjj]

It's underselling Julio, but there are plenty of people low on him including some of his owners who'd move him for a 1st and a WR who apparently is the only non Gronk option for Brady. Definitely not Veto worth

If you're upset, you should've made your own bit bigger offer for Julio. I'm sure that owner floated him on the block and got no other takers if he's settling for this

[pierson242]

It's underselling Julio, but there are plenty of people low on him including some of his owners who'd move him for a 1st and a WR who apparently is the only non Gronk option for Brady. Definitely not Veto worth

If you're upset, you shouldn't made your own bit bigger offer for Julio. I'm sure that owner floated him on the block and got no other takers if he's settling for this

x2

[jwb32]

It's underselling Julio, but there are plenty of people low on him including some of his owners who'd move him for a 1st and a WR who apparently is the only non Gronk option for Brady. Definitely not Veto worth

If you're upset, you shouldn't made your own bit bigger offer for Julio. I'm sure that owner floated him on the block and got no other takers if he's settling for this

X2

[Mints]

It's underselling Julio, but there are plenty of people low on him including some of his owners who'd move him for a 1st and a WR who apparently is the only non Gronk option for Brady. Definitely not Veto worth

If you're upset, you shouldn't made your own bit bigger offer for Julio. I'm sure that owner floated him on the block and got no other takers if he's settling for this

I wouldn't say I'm upset, certainly not over fantasy football... I'm just shocked!

[Dusticlez1]

I don’t believe in vetoing in dynasty...you never know how someone else values a player or what their end-game is...can’t go purely off ADP. I agree it’s underselling on Julio but that’s his loss...and who knows, might work out for him. I’ve seen worse...I’ve seen McClown go for a 1st and I’ve seen James Hoodie Jones go for a 1st after 2 big games late in his career....

[saw061600]

New to forum? Never going to get "veto" response because we all feel you should be allowed to run your own team, in your own way, with your own valuations, and the opinions of other owners in league be damned.

Think it's low for Julio but some are surprisingly very low on him. Ageism, foot (yes, have been told his foot is still a concern by during potential trades), TD#s etc. all conspire to want some owners to jump ship.

[lukkynumber13]

I prefer the Julio side but this isn't even close to veto-worthy. It's just a lopsided deal and frankly we see so much worse, every day on here.

[skip]

Never going to get "veto" response because we all feel you should be allowed to run your own team, in your own way, with your own valuations, and the opinions of other owners in league be damned.

You've definitely come to the wrong forum looking to support the idea of a veto on any trade when it comes to dynasty leagues. I understand why they have a place in high dollar redraft leagues but it is a low percentage of owners who would ever considering playing in dynasty leagues that use them.

[myndflyte]

Agree with everything said here. It's a bad trade for the person selling Julio but not veto worthy. Also, vetoes are dumb and I'd never play in a league that has them. And if a league has vetoes, it should be reserved for clear collusion, not bad trades.

[Goddard]

Most people will agree that vetoes should only occur when there's collusion involved. This, based on the information we have, doesn't sound like collusion. Just a very bad trade.

[collbey]

Veto? Seriously?

[moishetreats]

@Mints: Your title said that this was a trade; your post said that this was a proposal. Would you mind clarifying?

That being said, add me to the list of those who would (a) never veto this and (b) don't even think that it's outrageous (though definitely light).

[believeinthehunter]

honestly if this deal was a scrub and a couple seconds, maybe veto-worthy. but here the julio owner is getting veteran depth with a first. definitely not veto-worthy.

[jetsfan5757]

Soooooooooooooooooooooooooo not close to veto worthy.