1.01 versus 1.02 +1.03

This is the place for team advice - should I make this trade, should I draft that player, etc.
Jifhduke
Practice Squad
Practice Squad
Posts: 144
Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2018 6:43 pm

Re: 1.01 versus 1.02 +1.03

Postby Jifhduke » Sat Mar 17, 2018 8:14 pm

I am in the same spot with 1.2, 1.3, and 1.6. The owner of 1.1 wants all 3 picks. I am going to keep them all. Thinking of drafting Guice, and deciding on Cubb/Michel with the 1.2 and 1.3.
Team 1 (1 qb)

8 teams 50 player roster with a 7 player taxi squad: PPR

QBs: Winston, Prescott, Mahomes, Hurts, Lawrence

RBs, Kamara, R Jones, Edmonds, Swift, Robinson, Javonte Williams, Mattison , Barkley, Walker, James Cook, J Ford

WR: Mike Evens, Michael Thomas, M Williams, T Boyd, C Godwin, Sutton, Lamb, J Jefferson, T Marshall, Nico Collins, Josh Palmer, Pittman, Olave, J Williams, G Pickens

TE: Goedert, McBride, Hockerson, Kelce, Williams

2023 picks:
2 firsts (late)
2 seconds (early and late)
Picks (7 Round draft)
———————————————————
Team 2- (1 qb)
10 team PPR, 1RB, 1Flex, 4WR
QBs
Prescott, Mahomes
RBs
Taylor, Swift, Barkley, Robinson, ETN, J Williams

WR,
Lamb, Jefferson, Pittman, Elijah Moore, Juedy, Marshall, Juju, Mike Williams, Toney

TE
Andrews, Pitts, Albert O

Picks 2022 (5 round Draft)

1.10

roseyknee
Role Player
Role Player
Posts: 493
Joined: Sat Jun 27, 2015 6:35 am

Re: 1.01 versus 1.02 +1.03

Postby roseyknee » Sun Mar 18, 2018 8:05 am

If I could get a little added to the 1.01 side, I would seriously consider taking it then look to flip the 1.01, based on some of the crazy offers I've seen here (not sure what you could actually get in your league). You should be able to get a few high-ish end guys

hockeyBjj
Hall of Fame
Hall of Fame
Posts: 4535
Joined: Wed Dec 21, 2016 7:05 am

Re: 1.01 versus 1.02 +1.03

Postby hockeyBjj » Sun Mar 18, 2018 8:16 am

Rebuilding means you need as many stabs and chances to hit as you can

If a contender needing 1 more starting RB to potentially win it all then yes I'd pay the 1.2 and 1.3 for Barkley

I'd rather use those picks' value on other established RBs like Freeman though in that regard
Team 1- 10 team ppr, 1QB, 2RB, 3WR, 1TE, 2Flx, 1D, 1K
2022: 1-8
Finishes: 6th, 6th, 1st, 5th, 6th, 9th
QB: Lamar Jackson, Purdy
RB: Bijan, Dobbins, Achane, Charbonnet, Algier, McBride, waiver trash
WR: JSN, QJ, Addison, Dotson, Skyy Moore, Jameson Williams, Hyatt, T Dell, Boutte, Skowronek, Quez Watkins, Greg Dortch, waiver trash
TE: Hockenson, F Monroe, Juwan, Musgrave
D/K: Patriots, Vikings, Saints, Dicker

picks-
2024- 1,1,1,1,2,2,2,3,3,4,5,5
2025 1,1,1,2,3,4,5

team 2- 12 team SF, .5PPR, .5TE boost, 1QB, 1SF, 2 RB, 3WR, 1TE, 2Flex
2022: 8-1
Finishes: 2nd, 2nd, 2nd, 2nd :wall:
QB: Ljax, GenoD Jones, Minshew, Dobbs
RB: CMC, Stevenson, A Jones, Chubb, A Mattison, D cook, Perine, Mckinnon,
WR:Tyreek, Diggs, C Kupp, D Adams, Keenan Allen, Lockett, Gallup, A Lazard, Hodgins
TE: Kelce, LaPorta, Irv Smith,
No picks until 2026 5th rounder lol

PercyR1
Pro Bowler
Pro Bowler
Posts: 1247
Joined: Wed Feb 03, 2016 9:13 am

Re: 1.01 versus 1.02 +1.03

Postby PercyR1 » Sun Mar 18, 2018 12:57 pm

i would trade 1.2 and 1.3 for 1.1 / saquon is just a talent your not going to probably get a chance to snag ever again,

Any other year its not even close 1.2 and 1.3

Ricky1234
Combine Attendee
Combine Attendee
Posts: 16
Joined: Wed Oct 26, 2016 10:58 am

Re: 1.01 versus 1.02 +1.03

Postby Ricky1234 » Mon Mar 19, 2018 12:15 pm

The price for 1.01 is way too expensive. Take Guice and chubb with 1.02 and 1.03 as you are in a rebuild.
I am not sure what people are expecting from Barkley. He won't make 40 points every game.

Oriorden
Rookie
Rookie
Posts: 64
Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2018 12:40 pm

Re: 1.01 versus 1.02 +1.03

Postby Oriorden » Mon Mar 19, 2018 12:38 pm

I had to give up 1.2, 1.6, 1.10 and Marvin Jones (1-year deal) for 1.1. I had 4 other firsts this year, so needed to get rid of some.
As for trading the 1.02 and 1.03, I’d wait until after the nfl draft. Chubb is picking up some steam, and depending on landing spot, might be viewed evenly or ahead of Guice. You’d get more for the 1.02 and still might get the guy you wanted at 1.03. Risky but could be worth it.

jomaed
Pro Bowler
Pro Bowler
Posts: 1498
Joined: Mon Aug 29, 2016 5:19 pm

Re: 1.01 versus 1.02 +1.03

Postby jomaed » Mon Mar 19, 2018 12:39 pm

I guess I am in the minority here but id take 1.01 especially if the 1.11 is thrown in. A year from now it will be a Zeek vs Tread
well & Coleman situation where you wish you had just taken the best player over the chance of getting 2.


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Black Adam, Google [Bot] and 146 guests