My friend is crazy for considering this offer.

[ArrylT]

I concur with Goddard. While final value is depending on scoring settings and QB market in that league he isnt crazy to consider it. He should ask for a little extra if hes leaning towards accepting.

[Sports4hobby]

alright I am the trade considerie. completing this trade could also include accepting a trade for( 1.3 for kittle 1.12+2.3) see attachment for full roster New picks would be as follows 1.4, 1.11, 1.12, 2.3 with Goff and Kittle as additions

[Edgy68]

Last year, he was starting Flacco on a weekly basis. I don't feel it is crazy to replace that production with Goff's for what is essentially a 2 spot difference in picks (since he owns the 1.03 already). I agree he still gets to add a top RB and top QB, but I'd go RB and then look to trade for a top WR after solidifying my QB core like that.
He was advised not to take the Kittle deal by a majority of posters. The 1.03 should net more value than that.

[Nightmares]

His qb's are terrible in a superflex. It is not a terrible deal.

[millworkguy]

I'd make the trade, he only really has 2 qb's (Ryan and Flacco) and Goff is miles above Flacco. He moves back 2 spots (as he has 1.03) and still could get rb2 qb2 in the draft

[JT2]

Does anyone view Flacco as a viable starter in a SF if you already have an older tier 1 QB on your roster? That is the question. I see both sides bit Flacco worries me personally.

[Mrowmix]

I’d list his whole team but he’s more then set at qb

Matt Ryan, tannehill, Flacco and bridgewster

He's not more than set at QB in a 12 team SF. Ryan is an undesirable high performer, Tannehill and Flacco are low end producers, and Teddy B is a depth QB most likely for the Jets.

He already has the 1.01 and 1.03? I would draft Barkley and then take your second ranked QB, maybe your first if you are lucky.

1.04 and Goff for 1.01 and Flacco is pretty fair to me, though. I'd try to get like an extra second rounder back.