What's the difference? Diggs v Nuk

[hudini33]

Looking to get Nuk this off-season. Diggs will probably be on the table. How much would I need to add?

[Rtreilly81]

A top 4 pick and maybe more. Diggs is not in the same stratosphere

[Goddard]

Something close to 1.01 value.

[Needalife]

I traded 1.01/Engram/Martavis for Hopkins/Ertz/JWhite a few weeks ago.

You are going to need 1.01 or a stud involved. Diggs hasn’t been the model of consistent fantasy performances and I see him as a low WR2 or high WR3 so you are unlikely to entice someone to give you Nuk without a much bigger piece.

Nuk is arguably my top dynasty player.

[bigbuck22]

A lot!
I would need a stud involved as well.

[RB6]

A very high 1st and a young upside player.

[Johnny Canuck]

Based on the roster in your sig, you don't have the pieces, or the depth, to do this without creating holes elsewhere on your roster.

If you must have Nuk, Zeke and Nuk are close in value, but I'm guessing that's a nonstarter.

I guess you could add Gordon to Diggs, but then you'd be overpaying and need the other owner to add an RB2 of some kind. Gordon is essentially the only other player on your team that you could add, I imagine every other player would result in a "no" from the Nuk owner.

tbh I don't really see much disposable income/players to make a deal.

[WhatWouldDitkaDo]

Based on the roster in your sig, you don't have the pieces, or the depth, to do this without creating holes elsewhere on your roster.

If you must have Nuk, Zeke and Nuk are close in value, but I'm guessing that's a nonstarter.

I guess you could add Gordon to Diggs, but then you'd be overpaying and need the other owner to add an RB2 of some kind. Gordon is essentially the only other player on your team that you could add, I imagine every other player would result in a "no" from the Nuk owner.

tbh I don't really see much disposable income/players to make a deal.

x2 You'd need to give up Elliott or Diggs + Gordon.