CMC + for Winston + - superflex

[Detroitcity]

4 pt/passing TD, 12 team superflex PPR league with devys


Regardless of rosters, which side this trade do you prefer

Team A gives: CMC , Tannehill
Team B gives: Winston, Darnold

[Blueboy]

In SF I take option B.

Winston>CMC
Darnold>Tannehill (I think there's a realistic chance that the Phins move on from him, and Darnold has great potential)

By the way, there's a SF/2QB forum now. /viewforum.php?f=160

[skip]

I don't see much difference between Winston and Tannehill, though I realize rankings probably heavily favor the former. But Winston hasn't even cracked a top 15 in a season yet. Pretty overrated while Tannehill is a bit underrated. So it comes down more to CMC vs Darnold and whether you believe he will be a successful franchise QB in the NFL.

[Thurston4040]

Winston/Darnold for me

[IR1]

Like the Winston side a bit more, but if needed a rb and had qb depth I'd be ok with the cmc side

[joekuhns11]

In SF I take option B.

Winston>CMC
Darnold>Tannehill (I think there's a realistic chance that the Phins move on from him, and Darnold has great potential)

By the way, there's a SF/2QB forum now. /viewforum.php?f=160

This is an odd way to reference who's better. Why wouldn't you put the QB vs. QB & RB vs. RB.

Winston = Tannehill
Cmc>Darnold

Take the Tannehill & CMC side. Winston hasn't done anything to show he is better than Tannehill. CMC has shown what he can do with limited touches while Darnold is an unproven rookie!

[HughHoney]

I don't see much difference between Winston and Tannehill, though I realize rankings probably heavily favor the former. But Winston hasn't even cracked a top 15 in a season yet. Pretty overrated while Tannehill is a bit underrated. So it comes down more to CMC vs Darnold and whether you believe he will be a successful franchise QB in the NFL.

Agree with this

[HughHoney]

In SF I take option B.

Winston>CMC
Darnold>Tannehill (I think there's a realistic chance that the Phins move on from him, and Darnold has great potential)

By the way, there's a SF/2QB forum now. /viewforum.php?f=160

This is an odd way to reference who's better. Why wouldn't you put the QB vs. QB & RB vs. RB.

Winston = Tannehill
Cmc>Darnold

Take the Tannehill & CMC side. Winston hasn't done anything to show he is better than Tannehill. CMC has shown what he can do with limited touches while Darnold is an unproven rookie!

Because CMC is the only RB in the trade maybe?

[Detroitcity]

In SF I take option B.

Winston>CMC
Darnold>Tannehill (I think there's a realistic chance that the Phins move on from him, and Darnold has great potential)

By the way, there's a SF/2QB forum now. /viewforum.php?f=160

This is an odd way to reference who's better. Why wouldn't you put the QB vs. QB & RB vs. RB.

Winston = Tannehill
Cmc>Darnold

Take the Tannehill & CMC side. Winston hasn't done anything to show he is better than Tannehill. CMC has shown what he can do with limited touches while Darnold is an unproven rookie!

Because CMC is the only RB in the trade maybe?

LOL! When I first read his post I laughed and then I was trying to think of who he could be confusing Darnold with at RB, but I came up blank

Thanks for the responses (and the good laugh JoeKuhns)

[Phaded]

Winston & Darnold by a mile and it is not exactly close.