4 pt/passing TD, 12 team superflex PPR league with devys
Regardless of rosters, which side this trade do you prefer
Team A gives: CMC , Tannehill
Team B gives: Winston, Darnold
CMC + for Winston + - superflex
-
- Player of the Year
- Posts: 2188
- Joined: Tue Apr 24, 2012 4:18 pm
- Contact:
Re: CMC + for Winston + - superflex
In SF I take option B.
Winston>CMC
Darnold>Tannehill (I think there's a realistic chance that the Phins move on from him, and Darnold has great potential)
By the way, there's a SF/2QB forum now. /viewforum.php?f=160
Winston>CMC
Darnold>Tannehill (I think there's a realistic chance that the Phins move on from him, and Darnold has great potential)
By the way, there's a SF/2QB forum now. /viewforum.php?f=160
12-team SF, PPR, TE premium, 0.25 PPCarry
1QB 2RB 2WR 1TE 1SF 4Flex
QB: Mahomes, Fields, Love
RB: Bijan, ETN, Pollard, Achane, Herbert
WR: Kupp, Hill, Metcalf, Ridley, Jeudy, D.J. M, Burks, Hollywood, Wan'Dale
TE: Kyle Pitts, Goedert
Re: CMC + for Winston + - superflex
I don't see much difference between Winston and Tannehill, though I realize rankings probably heavily favor the former. But Winston hasn't even cracked a top 15 in a season yet. Pretty overrated while Tannehill is a bit underrated. So it comes down more to CMC vs Darnold and whether you believe he will be a successful franchise QB in the NFL.
If you can't leave at least a 20% tip, you can't afford to eat out.
-
- Rookie
- Posts: 70
- Joined: Sun Jan 21, 2018 6:59 am
Re: CMC + for Winston + - superflex
Winston/Darnold for me
Re: CMC + for Winston + - superflex
Like the Winston side a bit more, but if needed a rb and had qb depth I'd be ok with the cmc side
10Team PPR-QB/RB/WR/WR/TE/PK/flex-DT/DE/DE/LB/LB/LB/CB/CB/S/S/flex
QB- Herbert, Tua
RB- Barkley, Swift, Montgomery, Dobbins, Walker
WR-Adams, ARSB, JWilliams, Godwin, Metcalf, Allen, Kirk, Flowers
TE- Kelce, Goedert
PK
DT- Buckner, Simmons, QWilliams,
DE- Hunter, JBosa, Thibodeaux, JPHillips, Rousseau, Paye, Greenard
LB- Edmunds, Warner, E Kendricks, Wagner, De"Vondre Campbell, Asamoah, Sanders
CB- Moore, Howard, Reed
S- Dugger, Pitre, Thompson
IR Dobbins, Dulcich
Taxi- Kincaid, QJohnston
QB- Herbert, Tua
RB- Barkley, Swift, Montgomery, Dobbins, Walker
WR-Adams, ARSB, JWilliams, Godwin, Metcalf, Allen, Kirk, Flowers
TE- Kelce, Goedert
PK
DT- Buckner, Simmons, QWilliams,
DE- Hunter, JBosa, Thibodeaux, JPHillips, Rousseau, Paye, Greenard
LB- Edmunds, Warner, E Kendricks, Wagner, De"Vondre Campbell, Asamoah, Sanders
CB- Moore, Howard, Reed
S- Dugger, Pitre, Thompson
IR Dobbins, Dulcich
Taxi- Kincaid, QJohnston
-
- Pro Bowler
- Posts: 1341
- Joined: Tue Feb 11, 2014 6:57 am
Re: CMC + for Winston + - superflex
This is an odd way to reference who's better. Why wouldn't you put the QB vs. QB & RB vs. RB.ilangoneverdies wrote: ↑Wed Feb 21, 2018 9:22 pm In SF I take option B.
Winston>CMC
Darnold>Tannehill (I think there's a realistic chance that the Phins move on from him, and Darnold has great potential)
By the way, there's a SF/2QB forum now. /viewforum.php?f=160
Winston = Tannehill
Cmc>Darnold
Take the Tannehill & CMC side. Winston hasn't done anything to show he is better than Tannehill. CMC has shown what he can do with limited touches while Darnold is an unproven rookie!
Team #1 (Finished 2nd)
QB - Watson
RB - Hall, Jacobs, Mixon
WR - Tyreek, Jefferson, Chase, Jayden Reed, Cooper
TE - Goedert, Kmet
2024 Picks: 1.05, 1.10, 2.01
Team #2 (Finished 1st)
QB - Tua, Pickett
RB - Hall, Barkley, K. Walker, James Cook
WR - Chase, D. Smith, D. Adams, Hopkins, Jameson Williams
TE - Laporta
2024 Picks: None
QB - Watson
RB - Hall, Jacobs, Mixon
WR - Tyreek, Jefferson, Chase, Jayden Reed, Cooper
TE - Goedert, Kmet
2024 Picks: 1.05, 1.10, 2.01
Team #2 (Finished 1st)
QB - Tua, Pickett
RB - Hall, Barkley, K. Walker, James Cook
WR - Chase, D. Smith, D. Adams, Hopkins, Jameson Williams
TE - Laporta
2024 Picks: None
Re: CMC + for Winston + - superflex
Agree with thisskip wrote: ↑Wed Feb 21, 2018 10:27 pm I don't see much difference between Winston and Tannehill, though I realize rankings probably heavily favor the former. But Winston hasn't even cracked a top 15 in a season yet. Pretty overrated while Tannehill is a bit underrated. So it comes down more to CMC vs Darnold and whether you believe he will be a successful franchise QB in the NFL.
Re: CMC + for Winston + - superflex
Because CMC is the only RB in the trade maybe?joekuhns11 wrote: ↑Thu Feb 22, 2018 9:08 amThis is an odd way to reference who's better. Why wouldn't you put the QB vs. QB & RB vs. RB.ilangoneverdies wrote: ↑Wed Feb 21, 2018 9:22 pm In SF I take option B.
Winston>CMC
Darnold>Tannehill (I think there's a realistic chance that the Phins move on from him, and Darnold has great potential)
By the way, there's a SF/2QB forum now. /viewforum.php?f=160
Winston = Tannehill
Cmc>Darnold
Take the Tannehill & CMC side. Winston hasn't done anything to show he is better than Tannehill. CMC has shown what he can do with limited touches while Darnold is an unproven rookie!
-
- Player of the Year
- Posts: 2188
- Joined: Tue Apr 24, 2012 4:18 pm
- Contact:
Re: CMC + for Winston + - superflex
LOL! When I first read his post I laughed and then I was trying to think of who he could be confusing Darnold with at RB, but I came up blankHughHoney wrote: ↑Thu Feb 22, 2018 9:34 amBecause CMC is the only RB in the trade maybe?joekuhns11 wrote: ↑Thu Feb 22, 2018 9:08 amThis is an odd way to reference who's better. Why wouldn't you put the QB vs. QB & RB vs. RB.ilangoneverdies wrote: ↑Wed Feb 21, 2018 9:22 pm In SF I take option B.
Winston>CMC
Darnold>Tannehill (I think there's a realistic chance that the Phins move on from him, and Darnold has great potential)
By the way, there's a SF/2QB forum now. /viewforum.php?f=160
Winston = Tannehill
Cmc>Darnold
Take the Tannehill & CMC side. Winston hasn't done anything to show he is better than Tannehill. CMC has shown what he can do with limited touches while Darnold is an unproven rookie!
Thanks for the responses (and the good laugh JoeKuhns)
Re: CMC + for Winston + - superflex
Winston & Darnold by a mile and it is not exactly close.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: abloom, Bing [Bot], ElijahGemstone, Google [Bot], Stone2987 and 96 guests