Doctson, Jones, 1.11, 2.01 for Hilton, P. Barber and 3.06

[stoneghost28]

Just got that in my email. What do you guys think? Pick cost seems to be a bit excessive to me, especially considering the questions with health.

It's a league where you start QB, 4 RB's and WR's (you can go 3-1 at the position, or 2-2, leaning RB, WR or even), and a TE. I have the 1.01, 1.11, 2.01, 2.06, 2.11, 3.02, 3.11



My roster:
Goff

Gurley
Cook
A. Jones
Mack
Gallman
M. Davis
Prosise

OBJ
Evans
Watkins
Doctson
Lockett
T. Williams
Samuel

Engram
Jonnu Smith
G. Everett

[Edgy68]

You are most likely adding Barkley to Gurley and Cook and you have OBJ and Evans as well. That's 5 strong starters. Hilton is a good player and should maintain his value, but there is still a question with Luck. If I were going to pay that price, I'd target a younger WR. I don't see Barber being the answer and a 3rd is of little consequence usually. Doctson may or may not develop, but I feel Rodgers likes Jones as the starter and that 2.01 is essentially another late 1st with this deep class. I think I'd rather take 2 shots in that range and see how they and Jones develop.

[millworkguy]

I'd pass on that

[NFL-ons]

Hilton

[Goddard]

Hilton fairly easily for me.

[LondonMonarchs]

Hilton for me

[Phaded]

I would give that up for Hilton.

I thought Jones was Marvin.. Once I realized it is Aaron, easily was Hilton.

[moishetreats]

Easily Hilton. Given your top-end talent, consolidating picks and players that are unlikely to start for you for a player like Hilton is a no-brainer.

As for the suggestion of aiming higher, these pieces won't get anything better; I'm surprised that they will net you Hilton.

[greenbird]

Hilton

[pokerplayer1000]

Piling on the Hilton side...That is a steal in my opinion. There really isn't much difference between barber and aaron jones so you are giving up doctson who hasn't done much in 2 years plus a late 1st and early 2nd for TY and a 3rd