Mixon vs 1.02

[Dannobeans83]

Was offered Mixon for my 1.02 pick and I am not sure which has more value. I like Guice a lot but not sure if he has Mixon lvl talent, I would prefer to wait till post draft but other owner will not wait.

[Goddard]

viewtopic.php?f=6&t=154288&hilit=mixon

This should help.

[thomasscheeks]

I would probably keep my pick. I like Mixon but his value took a hit with the terrible offensive play of the Bengals. The pick will net you more value come draft time

[MichaelScarn]

I think it's even. I like Mixon more than any back not named Barkley this draft.

But I'd hold the pick at least until after the NFL draft as it will only go up in price.

[keller569]

I would probably keep my pick. I like Mixon but his value took a hit with the terrible offensive play of the Bengals. The pick will net you more value come draft time

I'd keep the pick too. While they might be similar in value, or you may even like Mixon more than any other back besides Barkley, 1.02 will only climb in value and end up netting you more come draft time.

[dd041496]

I personally like Mixon more than Guice but not as much as Barkley. I would put him in between the 1.1 and the 1.2 but can’t really say what draft picks would need to be added in order to close the gap. FWIW, I own Mixon and wouldn’t give him straight up for 1.2 but he was my 1a-1b rookie last year with Cook.

[darewood11]

I think it's pretty even so I'd hold hope to get the guy with the better situation. The guy who's not in Cincy.

[FFChamp]

I like what I saw out of mixon last year, but I do not like the bengals offence. I would want to wait foe the draft as well, but I couldn't blame you for either decision

[Favrezilla]

Mixon > 1.2

Imo. No idea where Guice will go, and I am not a huge fan of this draft class after Barkley for skill position players -- it is early and I have a lot of homework to do but outside of the qbs I'm not as sold as most on this class, I do believe it's deep but I think it's not with "premier" talent.

Mixon is, imo, a huge talent (and only 21) who will get better as will the bengals.

[Tripwired]

Mixon. I think he's a freak just waiting to bust out. Guice is impressive, but I think Mixon is better now and moving forward.

[Mkh3225]

I think you're fine either way, I think both players project about equally so really it's kind of a wash in my book.

[Chwf3rd]

Easily Mixon for me but just watch some tape of the top RBs and WRs this year and make the choice yourself

[lukkynumber13]

Mixon > 1.2

Imo. No idea where Guice will go, and I am not a huge fan of this draft class after Barkley for skill position players -- it is early and I have a lot of homework to do but outside of the qbs I'm not as sold as most on this class, I do believe it's deep but I think it's not with "premier" talent.

Mixon is, imo, a huge talent (and only 21) who will get better as will the bengals.

Agreed.

As others have said, the 1.02 itself is probably a more valuable asset than Mixon right now, so if you can flip it for a ransom then great. But otherwise, keep Mixon. Definitely keep Mixon if you'd plan on DRAFTING from the 1.02 instead of selling it.

[SpartacusPTech]

That's about right value in my eyes. I wouldn't take the 1.03 for Mixon, so It would need to be at least 1.02. I think this is a very fair and reasonable offer and splitting hairs here. Can't argue with someone who takes the other side as Guice will be a fine piece to add as well.

[SpartacusPTech]

I think it's pretty even so I'd hold hope to get the guy with the better situation. The guy who's not in Cincy.

Not against this line of thinking, but we have no idea where Guice will go yet, so it's too early to say this.