jarvis+ for Ertz

[playa_hata]

Im looking to buy ertz in a te premium league my team is in the signature and i feel i have the flexability to move jarvis. I offered him Jarvis and Shepard for Ertz and 2.05 and he declined but said it was very close. im thinking of going jarvis and someone for just ertz. he also has trey burton i can buy for much cheaper price.

[M-Dub]

I don’t think this really warrants a brand new thread.

[playa_hata]

was trying to remove the old one but dont know how my bad

[playa_hata]

thanks for your helpful input tho

[Goddard]

I like Ertz a lot, but I still think Landry is worth more. If anything, a straight up trade should he enough. If that original offer was rejected, I'd just walk away.

I wouldn't mind going after Burton, depending on what his asking price would be.

[topher]

I never looked at you roster on your previous thread, looking now, I think I'd just go for Burton. I am confident Olsen will bounce back and be Olsen again.

[pierson242]

TE premium means nothing to me! Keep Landry! Olsen will bounce back

[M-Dub]

was trying to remove the old one but dont know how my bad

You can’t delete a thread, but you can go back in and edit the subject line if you’re so inclined. Hope that was a little more helpful.

As an Ertz owner, I don’t think I’d move him for Landry and a late 2nd, but I don’t think it’s a bad offer. Like you, I feel pretty good about my WR corps and would view Landry as more of a luxury than a necessity. If the deal was for an RB in that same price range (Gordon or Freeman, for example), I might be more inclined to pull the trigger. Does your trade partner have a need at WR that Landry would fulfill?

[Docmcstuffins]

I'd keep Landry, it's full point ppr where Landry really has the most value. He should have still outscored Ertz by 25 points or so with that setup and they both pretty much had their ceiling years id say. Go see if you can snag Burton for much cheaper to have some insurance behind Olsen and keep plugging Landry into your lineup. He's borderline your 2nd best receiver.

[BigBawseRoss]

trade for burton

[DBass218]

I will echo the 'hold tight' response. Olsen should return and be very serviceable, at worse. I noticed you have Jesse James and it reminded me about Vance McDonald.... he might be a good dart throw if he's available.

[playa_hata]

was trying to remove the old one but dont know how my bad

You can’t delete a thread, but you can go back in and edit the subject line if you’re so inclined. Hope that was a little more helpful.

As an Ertz owner, I don’t think I’d move him for Landry and a late 2nd, but I don’t think it’s a bad offer. Like you, I feel pretty good about my WR corps and would view Landry as more of a luxury than a necessity. If the deal was for an RB in that same price range (Gordon or Freeman, for example), I might be more inclined to pull the trigger. Does your trade partner have a need at WR that Landry would fulfill?

its ppc league as well so i fell less able to trade melvin or freeman unless i get another starting rb back in return

[M-Dub]

was trying to remove the old one but dont know how my bad

You can’t delete a thread, but you can go back in and edit the subject line if you’re so inclined. Hope that was a little more helpful.

As an Ertz owner, I don’t think I’d move him for Landry and a late 2nd, but I don’t think it’s a bad offer. Like you, I feel pretty good about my WR corps and would view Landry as more of a luxury than a necessity. If the deal was for an RB in that same price range (Gordon or Freeman, for example), I might be more inclined to pull the trigger. Does your trade partner have a need at WR that Landry would fulfill?

its ppc league as well so i fell less able to trade melvin or freeman unless i get another starting rb back in return

Ha. That’s crazy. I didn’t even notice you had both of them on your roster. I was just trying to come up with an RB or two that would be similar in value to Landry and those were the first two guys who popped into my head. But yeah, I imagine the PPC factor probably increases RB values across the board.