Three 2019 1sts or the 2018 1.01?

[RB6]

2018 1.01.

[moishetreats]

In a vacuum, Barkley.

But, if your team is stacked already at RB, then the three 1st-round picks will help you continue to be competitive. Imagine having all that ammo to trade in-season to fill a hole or to buy low on an injured player. If you think that you're a Barkley away from competing, then I'd take him. If not, though, then I think that the three 1sts will protect your team's competitiveness faaaaar longer than Barkley would.

[Valhalla]

I'd take 1.1

[FKC]

Barkley all day! You don’t know where those 2019 1st’s will be in the draft order. To much uncertainty.

[hockeyBjj]

3 random firsts aren't enough. What if they all end up being late or mid?

Agreed. Not enough for a prospect like Barkley.

x3

Dogpile

For three 1st for the 1.1, it would have to be 1.3, 1.5, and 1.7 or better. Having to wait a year, and could end up with 1.7, 1.9, 1.11 for all you know, that's a hard pass

[jwb32]

1.01 by a lot. They'd need to be 2018 firsts including an early and mid.

[albedo1986]

To add to this - he's pushing pretty hard for the 1.01 so he's sending me a variety of trades.

E Sanders
DT
2 2019 firsts (projected to be ~1.05-1.09 most likely)

I'm finding this super interesting because of how much value it appears like you can get out of this 1.01 haha. And this isn't even the peak. I almost accepted this since my team is probably one the best contenders for next year.

[WhatWouldDitkaDo]

E Sanders
DT
2 2019 firsts (projected to be ~1.05-1.09 most likely)

Easy pass...keep the 1.01

[Ghosted]

Love the WR's in the '19 class. It's going to (hopefully) be really, really good, and we kind of need it to be. Harry is still somewhat of a projection, but he and AJ Brown are better than what we've seen recently, and that's just scratching the surface.

But I'd take Barkley and wouldn't think twice about it, personally; especially since we don't know where the picks will land.