Gronk for Diggs

[zoster80]

I have someone inquire about a Gronk for Diggs trade in PLP below. I own Kelce already so I'm good at the TE spot, but we have 2 flex's and I usually start both.

I am unhappy with my WR's so I do want to improve in that dept. If i wanted to make this move, what is the difference he would need to add to the deal, or is this an even straight up deal?

[pierson242]

I would need something added to diggs, such as a pick. Gronk should still carry more value

[hockeyBjj]

I'm very curious on how this will play out. I'm horrible at judging top tier TEs in the context of WRs and RBs

[thomasscheeks]

The gap between Gronk and Diggs is fairly large because of the position advantage. It would take the 1.04 or so to even get trade talks going. But I'm also not a big fan of Diggs. What has he done to deserve so much praise? Thielen was undrafted and ran circles around him this year. He's just another guy that will never live up to his price tag.

[Goddard]

I don't think the gap should be that big, but I do agree that Gronk probably hold more value right now. Maybe a late 1st would get it done.

[HughHoney]

I don't think the gap should be that big, but I do agree that Gronk probably hold more value right now. Maybe a late 1st would get it done.

This sounds about right to me too.

[thomasscheeks]

I don't think the gap should be that big, but I do agree that Gronk probably hold more value right now. Maybe a late 1st would get it done.

This sounds about right to me too.

Are we really valuing Diggs this closely to Gronk? Pretty much the best TE of all time?? Even with Gronk's injuries, it's not like Diggs has been the definition of healthy throughout his career. I just don't understand how y'all value Diggs so high, he hasn't proved anything yet

[Goddard]

I don't think the gap should be that big, but I do agree that Gronk probably hold more value right now. Maybe a late 1st would get it done.

This sounds about right to me too.

Are we really valuing Diggs this closely to Gronk? Pretty much the best TE of all time?? Even with Gronk's injuries, it's not like Diggs has been the definition of healthy throughout his career. I just don't understand how y'all value Diggs so high, he hasn't proved anything yet

I agree that Gronk will probably go down as the best TE of all-time, but he'll also be 29 by the start of next season and obviously has a long history of injuries. I'm assuming his value would be somewhere around 1.02-1.04, and I can't imagine a Diggs owner would sell him for much less than that (maybe 1.04-1.06, but even then I doubt you can get him that cheap). To me, a late 1st seems more than reasonable, especially with the 4.5 year difference in age.

[thomasscheeks]

I agree that Gronk will probably go down as the best TE of all-time, but he'll also be 29 by the start of next season and obviously has a long history of injuries. I'm assuming his value would be somewhere around 1.02-1.04, and I can't imagine a Diggs owner would sell him for much less than that (maybe 1.04-1.06, but even then I doubt you can get him that cheap). To me, a late 1st seems more than reasonable, especially with the 4.5 year difference in age.

This is my problem I guess. What has he done to deserve that kind of value? I feel like he's becoming the next Moncrief

[Goddard]

I agree that Gronk will probably go down as the best TE of all-time, but he'll also be 29 by the start of next season and obviously has a long history of injuries. I'm assuming his value would be somewhere around 1.02-1.04, and I can't imagine a Diggs owner would sell him for much less than that (maybe 1.04-1.06, but even then I doubt you can get him that cheap). To me, a late 1st seems more than reasonable, especially with the 4.5 year difference in age.

This is my problem I guess. What has he done to deserve that kind of value? I feel like he's becoming the next Moncrief

I'm personally not the highest on him, but I'm guessing that's where his owners would value him. I wouldn't compare him to Moncrief because he's actually produced when healthy (unlike Crief). I think the talent is there, but the injuries are what would concern me if I was buying.

[Pet_Smith]

a late first wouldn't be enough for me to sell Gronk. Might be different as I only play non-PPR. For our season (up to week 16) he'd have finished as the WR5 - above Julio amongst others (Diggs was way down in 19th - his best ever year). Given that he gives such a positional advantage I personally think he's more valuable than Julio, especially if you have Kelce and can start both. Julio pretty comparable though.

The flip side is his age and mounting injuries. It's probably a good time to sell, but personally I'd look to flip for WR1 straight up if you can get it, but can't see they'd be many buyers...

[WhatWouldDitkaDo]

I don't think the gap should be that big, but I do agree that Gronk probably hold more value right now. Maybe a late 1st would get it done.

This sounds about right to me too.

Are we really valuing Diggs this closely to Gronk? Pretty much the best TE of all time?? Even with Gronk's injuries, it's not like Diggs has been the definition of healthy throughout his career. I just don't understand how y'all value Diggs so high, he hasn't proved anything yet

I would also prefer to keep Gronk over Diggs + late 1st, but I do think that's about right in terms of consensus valuation. OP, what does the Tyreek Hill owner's roster look like? Have you considered swapping KC players by offering Travis Kelce for Hill?

[PercyR1]

Diggs side and if you own Kelce - SNAP that up!

[ddog2303]

I personally think your RBs are in dire need of a talent infusion. You’re WRs are a bit older but you have Ajayi at RB and no one else. I’d be looking to move Gronk for a good RB and more if you can get it.

[BigBawseRoss]

ya your WRs are fine, you need RB help badly...if i am moving one of em i am moving kelce (gronks qb shouldnt change next year and who knows how the kc qb switch will go) and i am targeting someone like dalvin cook, mixon, howard, henry