Luck for 1.02++ (2QB)

[Aldonall]

For the team in sig, I'm in dead last with 1.01 locked up. The offer on the table is.

Luck

vs.

1.02 (all but guaranteed, worst case 1.03)
Watkins
Flacco OR Jimmy G


Keep in mind, this would leave me with almost nothing at QB going forward, but allow me to secure Barkley + Guice (or something of the like) to shore up my RBs.

Thanks all

[Phaded]

I'd take the package; opting for Jimmy G.
We know what Flacco is at this point and in a rebuild, he's dead weight.

[mmass]

Starting 2 QB's? If so I would need a lot more for Luck.

[skip]

As much as I like Luck, I will take the package as well and despite my opinion on Garoppolo I'd rather take him than Flacco who may be the 2nd worst QB in the NFL

[dazza]

I'd take the package with Jimmy, too. Watkins either builds chemistry with Goff or likely picks his spot in FA next year (and I still love the talent). Add 2 top RBs in the draft and you should be more than set there. And I'd be surprised if at least 2 of Trubisky/Mahomes/Jimmy weren't decent (and improving) SF starters next season

Luck is great, but I think in this case you're better off without him

[Goddard]

This is really close. I think that's probably what it should take to get Luck in a 2QB league.

[Samhain34]

I'm going no on this. You're already stacked at WR so you don't need Watkins and who knows what Jimmy G is going to produce in SF? Luck is a star and Indy is finding out exactly just how bad they suck without him. I say Pagano is fired and they bring in somebody who is going to keep Luck alive. Stock up on RBs in the draft and keep what you have. You're stacked at QB for next year and in 2QB they will always have value.

[Jamiewtn]

I'm on the Luck side. His upside way out weighs the risk of him not fully recovering to his previous level.

[pokerplayer1000]

Would any of you trade OBJ for Garopollo, Sammy and 1.02? Because that is about the value of luck or a top qb in a 2 qb format.

[smoger45]

For the team in sig, I'm in dead last with 1.01 locked up. The offer on the table is.

Luck

vs.

1.02 (all but guaranteed, worst case 1.03)
Watkins
Flacco OR Jimmy G


Keep in mind, this would leave me with almost nothing at QB going forward, but allow me to secure Barkley + Guice (or something of the like) to shore up my RBs.

Thanks all

[IR1]

Pretty fair offer, but I think you need (a healthy) Luck more than that package

[smoger45]

For the team in sig, I'm in dead last with 1.01 locked up. The offer on the table is.

Luck

vs.

1.02 (all but guaranteed, worst case 1.03)
Watkins
Flacco OR Jimmy G


Keep in mind, this would leave me with almost nothing at QB going forward, but allow me to secure Barkley + Guice (or something of the like) to shore up my RBs.

Thanks all

That's fair value. In a 2 QB league you dont have to have the best QB but I dont know if Trubisky and Jimmy G will get you to the promise land. Adding Barkley and Guice Would be a start but you would have to add another QB at some point. It depends on if you want to sacrifice winning for a while. Who knows, maybe Mahomes gets a chance and lights it up like Watson did.

[block2323]

Take this trade as the value is definitely on the 1.02 and Watkins/Jimmy G side. At the draft you could then look to move one of those picks & Watkins for a better QB then luck...People are way too hung up on Luck and his past. Fact is, the Colts are an absolute mess, with no line and Luck simply cannot stay healthy. You also are in need of another RB. Keeping either the 1.01 or the 1.02 allows you to get a RB or two if you like or you can draft one and trade one of those picks for a QB. I think too many people focus on the trade itself (Leaving you with no current QB) and don't think what the 1.02 + Watkins + Jimmy could net you down the line. There are way too many QB's id rather have over luck going forward... Rodgers, Wilson, Watson, Dak, Wentz, etc.

Take the value. That pick will be worth a lot more come draft time...cash in on that Pick for a QB that will be on the field and will perform just as well if not better than Luck who has only done well up until this point based on pure volume.

[vixen]

your team is pretty good...barring injury
i am torn on this, because i think you have a playoff team but because of injuries your team has suffered the same fate as my team 2...you would have to hope that garopollo is not a bust and trubisky (and the bears) pull things together next year...
your QB lack of depth is the only thing holding me back on this trade...but i think it is a gutsy move if you make it....i think i would take a shot...i believe that pick is going to grow in value and you may be able to trade it for multiple pieces later
good luck

[Suhmdog]

I take the package draft rbs. You will be set for years to come at rb and wr