Tate vs. Baldwin

[hudini33]

Who's would need to add? I think I need to add to Tate, but thought I should check

[Goddard]

I think they're both pretty even in value, not sure I'd add anything to either side. They're both the same age, so that shouldn't matter. You can argue Tate has been more consistent over the past 3 years, while Baldwin has only done it for 2. Baldwin probably has the higher ceiling and will get you more TDs, but Tate feels safer (assuming it's ppr). I don't think you can really go wrong with either as your WR3.

[lukkynumber13]

I would need a First on top of Tate to sell Baldwin

[thomasscheeks]

I would say a second added to Tate would close the gap, but I wouldn't pay it. Tate should see similar numbers but his value is less

[jcc6fd]

I would need a First on top of Tate to sell Baldwin

X2, crazy how two games has affected their value so much. WR1 the past two years and Baldwin is still fighting for respect

[TaquitoPeddler]

Yep, while Tate might feel safe in terms of targets, he doesn't have the upside of Baldwin. Would need at least a 2nd added to Tate.

[cvbuc]

This is why I'd rather just hold Tate. The Baldwin owners tend to overvalue Baldwin and undervalue Tate (like most do) -not an ideal scenario to improve your team.

[Space Cowboy]

Baldwin can be a TD monster. He carries mor value for sure.