Montgomery/L.Miller for Kelce?

[mnpacker]

I lost Olsen. Trying to trade for Kelce. I made an offer for draft picks, but they were rejected. He has asked for Montgomery for Kelce. I've liked how Montgomery has looked (trying not to be biased as a Packer fan). Would you pull the trigger or maybe try to offer L.Miller instead? Or, is this value way off? Thanks.

[lukkynumber13]

I'd give up either one for Kelce

[M-Dub]

As an owner of both, I'd trade Miller for Kelce pretty easily, but I think I'd hold Monty. But I also have Ertz and Monty is my RB1 right now, so take it with a grain of salt, I guess.

[EAGLES]

I’d try moving Miller for Kelce first

[Goddard]

I'd move either, especially with your team and the depth at RB that you have.

[The Red Rooster]

I'd move either, especially with your team and the depth at RB that you have.

Agreed but I would MUCH rather move Miller if that were possible....I would even prefer to move Miller plus a 2nd rounder before moving Ty Mont right now.

[Slackalacker]

Try miller and a pick first before you do Monty. I'm not high on Monty but he has more value than miller.

But I have Kelce ranked as the #1 dynasty TE so I'd do either really

[skip]

I trust Miller will still have his starting gig longer than Montgomery will. But I also know how disliked Miller is on this board.