Mike Williams for Jarvis Landry?

[Never Veto1]

For team in my Sig I've been offered

Give: Mike Williams and Andre Holmes
Get: Jarvis Landry and Eli Rodgers

So basically this trade is Williams for Landry. I would be a little concerned that I would have both Parker and Landry on the same team. Plus Landry doesn't have a whole lot of TD potential. Thoughts?

[Mike from Canada]

I like Landry more than Williams. Pending legal action against Landry might be something to consider here. Plus this is 0.5 PPR, which depresses Landry's value somewhat.

[Never Veto1]

He also sent me this offer:

Give - Johnson/Williams
Get - Watkins/Landry/Coleman/J Charles

I think that might be an easy decline. Johnson is pretty valuable

[Mike from Canada]

Easy decline.

[Goddard]

Landry over Williams by a lot.

As for the second offer, is that David Johnson? If so, I'd keep him and just move Williams for Landry.

[Phaded]

Landry.

[Seventy5]

I like Williams more than Landry, but I'll assume I'm on an island with that one

[ColdZealDonkeyStrike]

Williams for ceiling, Landry for floor. Not a big fan of Landry in 0.5 PPR, but he is a lot safer.

ETA- seeing that it is 20 team, definitely give me Landry. The floor he provides becomes more valuable. Sorry for replying without all the details

[Avery]

I like Williams more than Landry, but I'll assume I'm on an island with that one

Not alone.

I think Landry has more immediate value and a higher floor but I think Williams has a much higher ceiling and is a buy low(sh) right now.

[Seventy5]

I like Williams more than Landry, but I'll assume I'm on an island with that one

Not alone.

I think Landry has more immediate value and a higher floor but I think Williams has a much higher ceiling and is a buy low(sh) right now.

Agreed. I would take Landry if I was contending and had a hole at WR2 or 3, but if I were rebuilding or I was contending and loaded at WR I would rather swing for the fences on Williams as I think he is being significantly undervalued right now due to short-term prospects, which really shouldn't matter THAT much for a rookie, IMO.

[Hahaclintondix]

Landry side

[Never Veto1]

I decided to go with Landry he'll pop into my lineup and help turn my team back into the winner it should be. I traded my 2018 1st to get Williams so it didn't cost much. I think I might be able to flip him for more than I'd be able to flip Williams for as well.

[ColdZealDonkeyStrike]

I decided to go with Landry he'll pop into my lineup and help turn my team back into the winner it should be. I traded my 2018 1st to get Williams so it didn't cost much. I think I might be able to flip him for more than I'd be able to flip Williams for as well.

That is a pretty crazy team in 20 team superflex. Sucks having DJ and Luck out but I can't imagine anyone matches up well with you when healthy.

[Never Veto1]

I decided to go with Landry he'll pop into my lineup and help turn my team back into the winner it should be. I traded my 2018 1st to get Williams so it didn't cost much. I think I might be able to flip him for more than I'd be able to flip Williams for as well.

That is a pretty crazy team in 20 team superflex. Sucks having DJ and Luck out but I can't imagine anyone matches up well with you when healthy.

It's taken time and a lot of trades. I have mainly tried packaging players so I can hold as many studs as possible. Each year we have to cut our roster to 11. Also I've made plenty of trades sending Rookies and especially QB's to other teams for proven players.

[Valhalla]

Landry for ceiling.
Landry for floor.
Landry for health.
Landry for hands.
Landry for proven production.
Landry for current ability to contribute.
Landry for president.