Foreman or Engram? LEAVE A LINK TO YOURS!

[Jmatt>Coleman]

I have liked foreman a lot, but I would go engram. Take away his te tag the guy appears like he has a chance to be special. 6'3 235 4.42 great hands. He doesnt look like a rookie and should be a big part of that offense. Lamar miller is a plodder but no way foreman takes that job outright. He didn't look that great against the bungles. Starter that looks good, or backup that looks ok

[dazza]

I think this one is closer than people are making it, too. The best comp I can come up with for Evans is Brandon Marshall...and Evans is 1/10th faster in the 40. Not saying he turns into that, but I think we'd all take it if he did. And the fact that NYG might be starting over at QB, while concerning, doesn't necessarily mean bad things for Evans since young QBs typically target the big-bodied guys in the middle heavily

I'd still lean Foreman, mostly because of my lack of faith in Miller and my belief that Foreman fits what HOU better as the hammer to pair with their defense while Watson develops. But I'm not especially convinced he becomes the better player, even in the format

[spider321]

It was not intentional, but I think all the feedback has made me more bullish on Engram.

He is 6'3, 235, fast, and he will in reality play WR, not TE.

Foreman just looks pedestrian to me. Yes, so does Miller, but I don't think either of them will be the long-term answer.

Please try to convince me I'm wrong! I never trust my instincts! lol