Todd Gurley or the 2017 1.01

[topher]

I would take Gurley over the 1.01

[jessup45]

If Gurleys biggest knock is landing spot, then I would argue that Fornette isn't any better off. At least Gurley was able to produce his rookie year. When was the last time anyone was excited about an RB in Jacksonville?

[Bisquiteen Trisket]

I think on value (or should I say return value), because people love numbers over players, I would vote 1.1...but I value Gurley over all of the rookies.

Just as an aside, when did JAX become a cushy landing spot for RBs? I know people hate Gurleys situation but they improved the OL, improved their outside weapons, improved their offensive coaching...why is LAR so much worse than Jax?

My thought exactly. LA is on the up-and-up right now. Watkins, McVay, Whitworth. That is huge for Gurley's value. Buy him now before he repeats/exceeds his rookie numbers. Fun fact: Gurley is only 4 months older than Fournette.

[MNnoles]

IMO rookie fever will have alot of people taking the pick. However I have seen what Gurley HAS done in the league before. I need to see what McVay brings to the offense and with Watkins out wide, I have faith he will produce alot closer to his rookie year than last. I would go with Gurley

[pierson242]

I'd take Gurley

[mike40]

I have the 1.01 and it would take more than gurley to trade that pick

[Hahaclintondix]

1.01 but close