Trade Offer

[Hambone72]

Team 1 sends:

Eric Decker
Marcellus Bennett
Demarco Murray
Pick 31

Team 2 sends:

Rob Gronkowski

Which side?

[kpholden]

I like the Gronk side for you.

You have good depth at RB and WR and can afford to trade Murray and Decker.

Gronk is a huge upgrade over Bennett. He's a game changer when healthy. He can put your team over the top.

[Goddard]

If you need depth, then the Murray side. But if you're a stud TE away from competing, I'd go with Gronk.

[mclilj]

I think you should take this, Gronk may be injury prone but he's worth it. You can stand to lose all those players plus I think Murray has at most this season left before Henry takes over.

[Petrolbomber]

I would keep the depth side. Bennett had 7 TDs last year and now moves to an offense that also has one of the best QBs and provides a big RZ tgt. Losing Murray would hurt your RB depth and Decker provides depth if there are issues between Nuk and whoever the QB is. Watson may be better but as a rookie won't fix everything.

[Hambone72]

Took the Trade. This is my real last shot at the title before Jones starts to decline. My TE has killed me two years in a row. With Prosise and Richard set to have bigger roles in okay with losing DeMurray. Every tight end is always supposed to explode in Green Bays offense and it never happens. Don't like the what ifs there.

[dblj1199]

I think Bennet would be your starter over Tamme, so how big of an upgrade is Gronk? Is the jump up in production worth the lose at rb? I think your definetly selling high on Murray, I can see him splitting more carries with Henry this season. I like your depth and would probably pass but I wouldn't be totally against you getting Gronk.