How to reload?

[Iliveofftheland]

Team 1 in my signature. Defending champ thanks to a few lucky bounces.

As you can see my RB situation turned from good to bad in one offseason -- Ingram now has AP, Rawls/Prosise now have Lacy and Kelley has Perine. And now I have a whole bunch of time-share / backup RB's. Sweet for me...

The positive side of this is that I hold pick 1.2 which will leave me with the ability to draft an RB not named Fournette. While I like the RB's, I'm not sure it is in my best interest to make one pick and move on.

Here is what I'm thinking about doing -- trading 1.2 and Dez for a package that returns me two known quantities. For example:
1.2 + Dez for Melvin Gordon + A. Jeffery
1.2 + Dez for Mike Evans + Blount
1.2 + Dez for D. Freeman + Crowell

Or, do I make a play to get AP + Lacy who are both on the same team? What would that take?

[harr]

If you can make trade 1 or 2 happen, I'd do those without hesitation. I'd expect those will both get rejected pretty easily though. I think trade 3 is an overpay. I think Freeman and Dez are close, but the 1.2 is an overpay for Crowell. If you do actually use the 1.2, take Davis. BPA always.

[QuintorrisLopezJones]

Not to insult your team, but your RB situation was never "good" in a 10 teamer. I agree with the poster above, I'd do 1/2 if you somehow could, but would not even consider 3

[Kramer]

If you can make trade 1 or 2 happen, I'd do those without hesitation. I'd expect those will both get rejected pretty easily though. I think trade 3 is an overpay. I think Freeman and Dez are close, but the 1.2 is an overpay for Crowell. If you do actually use the 1.2, take Davis. BPA always.

I agree with for the most part. I would consider Mixon with pick 2 as well as the rest of your team is set up to compete now.

[freddog97]

Here is what I'm thinking about doing -- trading 1.2 and Dez for a package that returns me two known quantities. For example:
1.2 + Dez for Melvin Gordon + A. Jeffery
1.2 + Dez for Mike Evans + Blount
1.2 + Dez for D. Freeman + Crowell

I would pass on all three of theses trades although trade 2 looks good in value but like you said you need RBs so it does not make sense for your team. I would see if you could trade down if your going to pass on Corey Davis. Maybe look for a trade like: 1.02 for 1.04+Lamar Miller/Hyde/Crowell try guy who the community is down on.

[harr]

Here is what I'm thinking about doing -- trading 1.2 and Dez for a package that returns me two known quantities. For example:
1.2 + Dez for Melvin Gordon + A. Jeffery
1.2 + Dez for Mike Evans + Blount
1.2 + Dez for D. Freeman + Crowell

I would pass on all three of theses trades although trade 2 looks good in value but like you said you need RBs so it does not make sense for your team. I would see if you could trade down if your going to pass on Corey Davis. Maybe look for a trade like: 1.02 for 1.04+Lamar Miller/Hyde/Crowell try guy who the community is down on.

Trades 1 and 2 are very clear wins for him. I don't mind the suggestion of moving the 1.02 for a 1.04 or 1.05 and Hyde/Miller guy. The OP would still get one of CMC or Cook at 1.04 or 1.5, assuming Mixon goes.

[moishetreats]

1) I'd also pass on trade three, though I am very high on both of those players.
2) I'd pass on trade one since I am not high on either of those players.
3) Worth considering, but...

This is a start-2 WR league. That devalues WRs considerably. You have three extremely attractive WRs now, though only one with the upside and security of Evans. If you can do that trade for Evans, though, I probably would. I think that OBJ/Evans/Cooks covers up a lot of RB holes.

If you cannot make the trade, however, I would without a shred of doubt take your top-ranked RB at 1.02. Again, in a start-2WR league, WRs are devalued. No way, IMO, that Davis is the BPA in this format.

[Goddard]

I'd do the first two easily.

[Iliveofftheland]

1) I'd also pass on trade three, though I am very high on both of those players.
2) I'd pass on trade one since I am not high on either of those players.
3) Worth considering, but...

This is a start-2 WR league. That devalues WRs considerably. You have three extremely attractive WRs now, though only one with the upside and security of Evans. If you can do that trade for Evans, though, I probably would. I think that OBJ/Evans/Cooks covers up a lot of RB holes.

If you cannot make the trade, however, I would without a shred of doubt take your top-ranked RB at 1.02. Again, in a start-2WR league, WRs are devalued. No way, IMO, that Davis is the BPA in this format.

To be fair though, a WR is most likely going to fit into my flex spot each week given the state of my RB's.

[Iliveofftheland]

To close this out, I was able to do a modified version of option 1. I gave Dez + 1.2 + Fiedorowicz and got Melvin + Jefferey + Snead.
I'm pretty happy

[freddog97]

Here is what I'm thinking about doing -- trading 1.2 and Dez for a package that returns me two known quantities. For example:
1.2 + Dez for Melvin Gordon + A. Jeffery
1.2 + Dez for Mike Evans + Blount
1.2 + Dez for D. Freeman + Crowell

I would pass on all three of theses trades although trade 2 looks good in value but like you said you need RBs so it does not make sense for your team. I would see if you could trade down if your going to pass on Corey Davis. Maybe look for a trade like: 1.02 for 1.04+Lamar Miller/Hyde/Crowell try guy who the community is down on.

Trades 1 and 2 are very clear wins for him. I don't mind the suggestion of moving the 1.02 for a 1.04 or 1.05 and Hyde/Miller guy. The OP would still get one of CMC or Cook at 1.04 or 1.5, assuming Mixon goes.

Trade 2 is awesome value but 1 is a wash to me. I actually thinks he's loosing value if he did 1.

1.02>=Gordon
Dez>Alshon

[pierson242]

To close this out, I was able to do a modified version of option 1. I gave Dez + 1.2 + Fiedorowicz and got Melvin + Jefferey + Snead.
I'm pretty happy

Gordon > 1.2
Dez = Alston
Snead >>> Fiedorowitz