K Allen + for Kelce +

[zoster80]

This is for Zo nasty below
I really want to solidify my Te position since both Ertz and Ebron while having great potential, they have not been consistent.

Is k Allen + Ebron for Kelce + D Parker good enough offer?

This guy already has contacted me before about K Allen and now that mike Williams is possibly out for the year, the arrow is pointing up. I'm asking for Parker back to not deplete my depth, he has bunch of other WRs but I would think he values them more...d Bryant, D Thomas, Watkins, T hill, Diggs

Is the offer fair enough to get him interested or do I need to add to the offer?

[Space Cowboy]

Kelce is a total monster. You're not giving enough, esp if he's big on Parker which I'm not and this is still lop sided.

[Goddard]

I actually think it's pretty fair. Allen and Kelce should be fairly close in value. Probably the same for Ebron and Parker.

[Seventy5]

I don't have a preference here; it is a fair deal.

Allen>Kelce>Parker>Ebron

or

Proven WR1 + upside TE for proven TE1 + upside WR (roughly)

[Minnkota]

I am firmly on the Kelce side on this one, but I am admittedly very low on Ebron. I think Kelce is going to be a top 3 TE for the next 5ish years....and Parker is primed for a breakout.

[Generic Username]

I'm not sure Allen is a "proven" WR1, more a quite capable ER when on the field...that said, it's fair and the outcome will mostly hinge on how Ebron and Parker are viewed

[QuintorrisLopezJones]

I'm on the Kelce side easily, but worth offering nonetheless