Page 1 of 1
Arob vs Nuk
Posted: Mon Jul 17, 2017 1:05 pm
by RB6
In a startup, gonna be OTC soon at 2.04. Both available now at 2.03. Who do you like more, if both are still available? Got Coop at 1.11.
Re: Arob vs Nuk
Posted: Mon Jul 17, 2017 1:17 pm
by Gtdano_14
Can't go wrong with either, but I'll take Hopkins and sacrifice the 1 year age difference.
Neither WR has an amazing QB to thrive off of so I'll take the guy with less competition for targets.
Arob doesn't catch a great rate of the passes thrown his way. And the way the Jaguars are going, they won't need to be throwing as much as in the past (improved running game and defense).
Re: Arob vs Nuk
Posted: Mon Jul 17, 2017 1:35 pm
by QuintorrisLopezJones
I'd go Nuk, but its close
Re: Arob vs Nuk
Posted: Mon Jul 17, 2017 1:35 pm
by AndrewS
Give me Nuk and what i think will be a much improved QB situation over the next 4-5 years. He is the primary target and doesn't have much competition in that area. Also, i expect the Jags offense to be much more run-oriented over the next few years. However, i'd be happy with either at 2.04!
Re: Arob vs Nuk
Posted: Mon Jul 17, 2017 1:40 pm
by RB6
AndrewS wrote: ↑Mon Jul 17, 2017 1:35 pm
Give me Nuk and what i think will be a much improved QB situation over the next 4-5 years. He is the primary target and doesn't have much competition in that area. Also, i expect the Jags offense to be much more run-oriented over the next few years. However, i'd be happy with either at 2.04!
If both are available, I'm gonna try to trade up to 2.05 and grab both.
Re: Arob vs Nuk
Posted: Mon Jul 17, 2017 1:59 pm
by Goddard
Hopkins by a hair.
Re: Arob vs Nuk
Posted: Mon Jul 17, 2017 2:00 pm
by eraldo_coil
Nuk is the (slightly) safer option, IMO.
Re: Arob vs Nuk
Posted: Mon Jul 17, 2017 6:34 pm
by hord
cant really go wrong... but I think nuk is the better talent, and also the better situation honestly... might be a slow start again this year, but they have a good QB in the works and I think nuk will be a stud again in no time... wish I had this problem!
Re: Arob vs Nuk
Posted: Mon Jul 17, 2017 7:04 pm
by IR1
Nuk, what are you offering for 2.05
Re: Arob vs Nuk
Posted: Tue Jul 18, 2017 2:36 am
by jeffster
Piling on for Hopkins by a hair.
Re: Arob vs Nuk
Posted: Tue Jul 18, 2017 5:05 am
by pierson242
Nuk but its like splitting hairs
Re: Arob vs Nuk
Posted: Tue Jul 18, 2017 5:48 am
by roseyknee
Personal preference imo. Both are in similar situations: Nuk's breakout was with an absurd amount of targets and not sure we can assume rookie QB is an improvement over Brock (I'd be shocked if it wasn't; ARob should be seeing less targets, but hopefully better targets (LF should make defenses respect the run and maybe Bortles improved?). I think both are in for a better '18 than '17
Re: Arob vs Nuk
Posted: Tue Jul 18, 2017 6:26 am
by jimmychoi
I'm leaning Hopkins. I really do think the Jags and Coughlin are going to run as much as they can.
Re: Arob vs Nuk
Posted: Tue Jul 18, 2017 8:19 am
by Balzac
roseyknee wrote: ↑Tue Jul 18, 2017 5:48 am
Personal preference imo. Both are in similar situations: Nuk's breakout was with an absurd amount of targets and not sure we can assume rookie QB is an improvement over Brock (I'd be shocked if it wasn't; ARob should be seeing less targets, but hopefully better targets (LF should make defenses respect the run and maybe Bortles improved?). I think both are in for a better '18 than '17
To play contrarian, Allen's breakout came with an unsustainable Average Receiving Yards and TD Rate. I remember many a fantasy sundays watching Allen get some crazy lucky breakaway and run down the field for a TD.
I would take Nuk over him based on pure talent.