Which Side would you rather?

[Eli4Prez]

For Team 2 in sig.

I give Keenan Allen and Devante Parker

I get Carlos Hyde and Stefon Diggs

[mnbend]

I would lean toward keeping Allen and Parker but you are pretty deep at WR so can see the upside in this. I am not 100% sold Diggs can do what he did last year.

[BRunner]

More value on the Keenan side. Seems like for Keenan, you could get a better RB than Hyde, whose standing is a bit tenuous.

[vixen]

More value on the Keenan side. Seems like for Keenan, you could get a better RB than Hyde, whose standing is a bit tenuous.

I agree. I think it is a good idea to trade depth at WR for a RB. But think you can do better than Hyde

[Shcritters]

Allen/Parker for me.

[Goddard]

Keenan for me as well.

[millworkguy]

Gotta go with the rest of them. Allen and parker. Could you get a 1st thrown into the deal?

[Parker8]

Hyde and Diggs for me.

Hyde's value is going to be up and down throughout the offseason but I just don't think parker is ever going to live up to his value and with so many WRs there in Miami I don't think his value will get out of control either. Diggs does have a lot of competition but he has really looked good at point. I'd go with the Hyde and Diggs value

[mrmagloo]

Hold out for more.

[IR1]

Allen easy for me

[Mitchbs]

I'm against the grain and take the Hyde/Diggs side

[GreenAndWhite81]

More value on the Keenan side. Seems like for Keenan, you could get a better RB than Hyde, whose standing is a bit tenuous.

I agree. I think it is a good idea to trade depth at WR for a RB. But think you can do better than Hyde

x2? x3? Anyway, yeah - I'd just shop Keenan (or Keenan + Parker) for a better RB.

[Peteey84]

Keenan side

[scoonie21]

Even though you need a RB more than you need a WR, i'd stick with Keenan and try to get a better RB than hyde.

[0crush83]

KA side. Aim for a better RB tan Hyde. Using KA and Parker should get you more.