Devante Parker vs 1.3

[skip]

If we are talking value relative to this year's WRs, Parker is a solid option after Davis and Williams. But there are multiple backs and TEs who are better options. I wouldn't even consider Parker until at least 1.10 relative to this whole class.

[schiewerma21]

Good point skip. I think Parker is fair around 1.08. But I agree late first is the most I would pay.

The top players though... especially the top four of Mixon fournette mccaffrey and Davis he shouldn't even be in the conversation

[Gtdano_14]

1.03 without hesitation.

[IR1]

Like the potential for the year 3 break out, but still would take 1.03

[Mtt33]

Jesus. 1.3 all day lol. This is an embarrassing question. Even if he "breaks out" he isn't worth 1.03.

He wasn't 1.03 in his own class and all he's done is be a massive dissappointment since then

Using the logic that "he wasn't even 1.03 in his own class" is more embarrassing than the question in my opinion.

[dblj1199]

If someone offered my the 1.3 I'd most likely take the deal. He's also my #4, but I'd also love a shot at a top rb vs a wr who has largely been a disappointment other than being in shorts this off season.

[ColdZealDonkeyStrike]

Unless Gurley, Gordon, and Cooper are also in this class, why does it matter that his original rookie ADP was 4/5?

1.03 over Parker, just on value and long-term stability. I think Parker is more likely to give you a startable player this year than 1.03, but if Parker doesn't take another step this year he will drop in value. If he is sitting on your bench, take the rookie who is worth more now and is not as much of a risk to lose value this season.

I personally have Parker with or slightly ahead of Williams, so I guess I value him at around 1.05/1.06. To me he is a slam dunk over guys like Ross, the TEs and the 3rd-4th round RBs.

[thomasscheeks]

1.03 without question

[Walter Sobchak]

1.03 easily