Overload at WR and have the 1.02

[goinyard24]

Hey guys, this is for team 1 and as you can see, my WR depth is pretty solid. The guy at 1.1 is taking LF so the question is, do I take Davis anyhow and then Mixon/CMC with the 1.4? Guy at 1.3 likes CMC more than Mixon so I may end up with him and Davis if I go that route. Just keeping stacking WRs? Thanks guys.

[dynastysports]

I know a lot of people have Davis "number 1" but for me personally Mixon, McCaff, Davis, and LF are all in the same tier. Since you have two picks in the top 4 take the two you like the most. If it is me I'm taking Davis at 1.02 and then whoever is left of the 4 at 1.04

[goinyard24]

I know a lot of people have Davis "number 1" but for me personally Mixon, McCaff, Davis, and LF are all in the same tier. Since you have two picks in the top 4 take the two you like the most. If it is me I'm taking Davis at 1.02 and then whoever is left of the 4 at 1.04

I think i have to do that right? I am just trying to think of all possibilities but I cant see passing on CD right there. I just wanted some other opinions and see what people thought.

[Goddard]

If you know the guy at 1.03 will take CMC over Mixon, then you have to go Davis at 1.02 and then steal Mixon at 1.04.

[timmybhoy]

Take Davis and if Mixon is there at 4 you're laughing

[goinyard24]

If you know the guy at 1.03 will take CMC over Mixon, then you have to go Davis at 1.02 and then steal Mixon at 1.04.

He is most likely going CMC there. Mixon and Davis were my original thoughts, thanks for the input fellas.

[moishetreats]

In your sig for Team 1, do you mean "Dixon"? You listed Mixon...

[IR1]

For me Davis at 1.02 and Mixon at 1.04 if 1.03 takes CMC

[RB6]

If you know the guy at 1.03 will take CMC over Mixon, then you have to go Davis at 1.02 and then steal Mixon at 1.04.

This

[goinyard24]

In your sig for Team 1, do you mean "Dixon"? You listed Mixon...

I wanted to see what he looked like on the squad! Ha. He is off.

[srlarson]

I go the other way....I see two options....
1.) at 1.02 take CMC, then 1.03 takes Davis? you get Mixon at 4.....
or
2.) Take Mixon at 1.2...and let the 1.03 guy choose between Davis and CMC and you take whoever is left......

But you need two RB's so if you get Davis need to flip him or one of your other WR's for a RB that has a pulse.....no sense having assets sitting on the bench when you need starters.

[jcc6fd]

I'd take Mixon at 1.02 to lock him down, unless you like CMC more. Then 1.03 has to choose between Davis and CMC. If he takes Davis then you get CMC and that helps your roster more. If he takes CMC then you get Davis, which is what you were hoping/planning for anyway.

[dblj1199]

I'm taking Davis firs then what ever rb is there at 1.4. You still have your 1.9 that you could package with some wr depth and move back up in the first.

[Tripwired]

I'm not sure you can ever truly be certain of what someone is going to do in a draft. You think the guy at 1.03 likes cmc over Mixon, but maybe he sees your options and feels if he can convince you that he's going cmc no matter what, and that you'll get all comfortable and take Davis at 1.02. That's what I'd try to do if I were in the 1.03 hole. I'd feel you out and if you said you were possibly taking Mixon, then I'd act like he's got herpes or something. That way I wouldn't appear as a threat. I'd never trust someone with regards to their supposed draft plan if they are drafting right behind me. It's a game of poker at this point. Why would I tip my hand? Just something to think about. If Mixon is your guy, TAKE HIM! Take what's left over at 4. Don't underestimate someone's apparent lack of interest in a player. I'm not saying for sure this is the case in your situation, but why fool around and risk being wrong here. Mixon, imo, is the guy I'd want for sure.

[collbey]

Based on talent and with your team needs, the guy you can't miss out on with those 2 picks is Mixon, so I am taking him at the 2 pick and seeing how the 3 pick plays out.