Hyde for THill

[fantasydem]

Straight up swap for team 1 in my signature. Curious of who you guys would take and why

[FiremanEd]

Tyreek Hill I assume?

[fantasydem]

Tyreek Hill I assume?

Yeah sorry should've made that clear

[Gtdano_14]

Pass. I'm staying with Hyde. Not sold on Hill and not scared of Williams.

[vixen]

i would stick with hyde as well...and i am not that big of a fan

[IR1]

Hyde, need 2 rb and not a hill believer

[cowboysfan]

I'm a Hill owner but would take Hyde.

[bwhauf]

I would take Hill. His role will increase this year and Hyde's lead back position looks questionable under Shanahan

[joshuawrobbins]

I'd also stick with Hyde. I see Hill as more of a gadget player than a true WR. I think Reid has to manufacture touches for him

[Lime]

I have Hyde. I think the Joe Williams thing is blown out of proportion. Hyde is a beast and should be a near workhorse if he stays healthy. I think they will spell Hyde with Williams to make sure he doesn't get overworked, but Hyde is just the more talented back. Also, Hyde is pretty much all they have on offense. Garcon should help a bit, but their QB situation is still deplorable.

Worst case scenario, Hyde is cut at the end of 2017 and then becomes the three down back for someone like the Raiders or Eagles next year.

As for Hill, I think he will have a hard time sustaining his production. The Chiefs are run-first and just picked up Kareem Hunt to run some more, he will likely be there to siphon dump off passes along with Ware, they still have Kelce, Maclin should rebound at least a bit after a poor year last year.

I think Hyde is the safer short term play, safer long term play, has a safer floor, and has a near comparable upside to T. Hill.

[whodunnit]

Hyde. by quite a bit

[jnappy]

Hyde. by quite a bit

Yup. In a vacuum it's weighted way to Hyde, and for your team he makes way more sense too.

[Goddard]

You need Hyde so much more than Hill.

[Alex116]

I have Hyde. I think the Joe Williams thing is blown out of proportion. Hyde is a beast and should be a near workhorse if he stays healthy. I think they will spell Hyde with Williams to make sure he doesn't get overworked, but Hyde is just the more talented back. Also, Hyde is pretty much all they have on offense. Garcon should help a bit, but their QB situation is still deplorable.

Worst case scenario, Hyde is cut at the end of 2017 and then becomes the three down back for someone like the Raiders or Eagles next year.

As for Hill, I think he will have a hard time sustaining his production. The Chiefs are run-first and just picked up Kareem Hunt to run some more, he will likely be there to siphon dump off passes along with Ware, they still have Kelce, Maclin should rebound at least a bit after a poor year last year.

I think Hyde is the safer short term play, safer long term play, has a safer floor, and has a near comparable upside to T. Hill.

Thanks, you just saved me typing out a similar opinion! Well stated.

[cvbuc]

I have Hyde. I think the Joe Williams thing is blown out of proportion. Hyde is a beast and should be a near workhorse if he stays healthy. I think they will spell Hyde with Williams to make sure he doesn't get overworked, but Hyde is just the more talented back. Also, Hyde is pretty much all they have on offense. Garcon should help a bit, but their QB situation is still deplorable.

Worst case scenario, Hyde is cut at the end of 2017 and then becomes the three down back for someone like the Raiders or Eagles next year.

As for Hill, I think he will have a hard time sustaining his production. The Chiefs are run-first and just picked up Kareem Hunt to run some more, he will likely be there to siphon dump off passes along with Ware, they still have Kelce, Maclin should rebound at least a bit after a poor year last year.

I think Hyde is the safer short term play, safer long term play, has a safer floor, and has a near comparable upside to T. Hill.

Thanks, you just saved me typing out a similar opinion! Well stated.

x2