Revisist 2 offers after NFL draft. Thoughts?

[Buckhill Bombers]

So wanted to get some opinions now that the draft is over if you guys don't mind. Would anyone take either option in a 12 team PPR dynasty?

Give: 1.7, 1.11
Get: 1.5

(right now this doesn't look as attractive as it did pre-draft personally, but would like to hear others thoughts)

Give: Gordon, Hunter Henry, 1.7, 2.1
Get: Gurley, Reed, Fat Rob Kelly, 1.5

Still going back and forth with this. I think Perine can absolutely win that job, and feel like Kelly is just a jag. Reed will outscore Henry this year, but is a big injury risk with concussions. RBs seem to be close...Gurley the better talent, Gordon the better team/offense.

Stand pat or consider either? Roster below:

Winston, Rivers, Palmer
Gordon, Miller, Lacy, Gore, Jon Wililams, Jacquizz Rodgers, Draughn, Alfred Blue, Matt Jones
Julio, AJG, Cooks, White, Snead, Desean, Patterson
Henry, Ebron
Picks 1.7, 2.1

[brooklynkid]

Well what's the starting requirements? Do you have 1,7,1.11, and 2.1? I wouldn't do either of those. I personally think you have a good team. I would keep the picks and build your depth

[BradysBunch]

on the 2nd trade..I would stay pat. the rams did not address their line in the draft. Chargers did! I like Henry over Reed long term. then to me it is the picks. if you like the upgrade, just trade the picks. But I would wait until the draft because you dont know who will be there. Cook could be there. If that is the case, then I would make the trade. But you could get 2 starting RBs with the two picks too. so...to sum it up, no to trade 2, maybe to trade one, but I would wait until it is on the clock. I offered the 1.8 and 1.10 for the 1.5 before the draft. I am happy that it was not accepted.

[mrmagloo]

I would probably stick with what you have. Reed and Kelley could be out of the league in 2 years.

[Goddard]

Yes to the first, no to the second.