b

This is the place for team advice - should I make this trade, should I draft that player, etc.

Eifert, rawls, late 2018 1st vs 1.03

Eifert, rawls, late 2018 1st
5
33%
1.03
10
67%
 
Total votes: 15

youwillneverfindme
Combine Attendee
Combine Attendee
Posts: 29
Joined: Fri Apr 28, 2017 9:36 am

b

Postby youwillneverfindme » Sat Apr 29, 2017 9:50 pm

c
Last edited by youwillneverfindme on Thu May 11, 2017 6:03 pm, edited 1 time in total.
YOU WILL NEVER FIND ME

User avatar
turfhero
Rookie
Rookie
Posts: 81
Joined: Fri Jul 31, 2015 2:20 am

Re: Eifert+ vs 1.03

Postby turfhero » Sat Apr 29, 2017 11:20 pm

If it were 1.02 I'd do it so i'm guaranteed McCaffrey. But since it's 1.03 and the Bengals backfield is muddy, i'd rather hold off. Assuming that Fournette is the consensus 1.1.

User avatar
Goddard
GOAT
GOAT
Posts: 27771
Joined: Wed Feb 15, 2017 9:21 am

Re: Eifert+ vs 1.03

Postby Goddard » Sat Apr 29, 2017 11:32 pm

1.03

youwillneverfindme
Combine Attendee
Combine Attendee
Posts: 29
Joined: Fri Apr 28, 2017 9:36 am

r

Postby youwillneverfindme » Sun Apr 30, 2017 7:32 am

c
Last edited by youwillneverfindme on Thu May 11, 2017 6:03 pm, edited 1 time in total.
YOU WILL NEVER FIND ME

User avatar
sugbear65
Ring of Fame
Ring of Fame
Posts: 3848
Joined: Thu May 17, 2012 5:12 pm

Re: Eifert+ vs 1.03

Postby sugbear65 » Sun Apr 30, 2017 7:39 am

I'm not going to say it's a slam dunk. But you can afford to lose Eifert with Ertz on your roster too. And Rawls is ok but that's a muddy situation in Seattle. Overall, if u got a touch of fever and want to make an early rookie pick without giving up the farm, then I wouldn't have a problem with this deal.

The only drawback being that if you trade the TE, you won't be able to name your team "it Ertz when Eifert", so that should seriously be considered here.

youwillneverfindme
Combine Attendee
Combine Attendee
Posts: 29
Joined: Fri Apr 28, 2017 9:36 am

c

Postby youwillneverfindme » Sun Apr 30, 2017 8:21 am

d
YOU WILL NEVER FIND ME


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], saw061600 and 27 guests