b
-
- Combine Attendee
- Posts: 29
- Joined: Fri Apr 28, 2017 9:36 am
b
c
Last edited by youwillneverfindme on Thu May 11, 2017 6:03 pm, edited 1 time in total.
YOU WILL NEVER FIND ME
Re: Eifert+ vs 1.03
If it were 1.02 I'd do it so i'm guaranteed McCaffrey. But since it's 1.03 and the Bengals backfield is muddy, i'd rather hold off. Assuming that Fournette is the consensus 1.1.
-
- Combine Attendee
- Posts: 29
- Joined: Fri Apr 28, 2017 9:36 am
r
c
Last edited by youwillneverfindme on Thu May 11, 2017 6:03 pm, edited 1 time in total.
YOU WILL NEVER FIND ME
Re: Eifert+ vs 1.03
I'm not going to say it's a slam dunk. But you can afford to lose Eifert with Ertz on your roster too. And Rawls is ok but that's a muddy situation in Seattle. Overall, if u got a touch of fever and want to make an early rookie pick without giving up the farm, then I wouldn't have a problem with this deal.
The only drawback being that if you trade the TE, you won't be able to name your team "it Ertz when Eifert", so that should seriously be considered here.
The only drawback being that if you trade the TE, you won't be able to name your team "it Ertz when Eifert", so that should seriously be considered here.
-
- Combine Attendee
- Posts: 29
- Joined: Fri Apr 28, 2017 9:36 am
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], saw061600 and 27 guests