M. Bryant for Picks

[Scoop74]

In my 14 team league below, I've been offered Martavis Bryant for my 2.03 and 3.03 picks. What do you think?

[jomaed]

I'd take Bryant all day here.

[Warriors09]

On the surface it looks good even though I would prefer a first due to ability and situation, but that might be impossible to achieve as there will always be a year long suspension lurking. Which leaves you hoping the next Roto blurb isn't news of Bryant failing another drug test. Depending on a few landing spots the 2.03 might land you a player of equal potential as there are several second/third tier guys with his size/speed combo.

[Goddard]

I'd rather have the picks, but it's not a terrible offer.

[BuckeyeNation]

For picks 17 and 31, I'd take Bryant.

[srlarson]

Bryant...and it's not close.

[Steelersfan]

I'd take it.

[IR1]

Pass for me, been burnt by suspensions in the past, he's not even reinstated yet

[onetwothree]

Bryant. About the same odds of the pick hitting as Bryant staying clean. Take the guy you know can do it. Cheapest you'll get him for.

[whodunnit]

Bryant. I gave up a 2nd for him last year and don't even care. As onetwothree stated above, about the same odds as a rookie hitting

[Crwdstunna]

I love Bryant's talent, but I simply don't trust him to stay clean over the next few years. I'd take the picks here.

[Scoop74]

I was also offered Golden Tate for the same picks...ranked pretty close, but not as much drama. Though not as much flair as Bryant either I suppose.

[skip]

I was also offered Golden Tate for the same picks...ranked pretty close, but not as much drama. Though not as much flair as Bryant either I suppose.

I'd much, much rather own Tate than Bryant. Maybe not the flashy name, but he will be more productive and no risk.

[BuckeyeNation]

I was also offered Golden Tate for the same picks...ranked pretty close, but not as much drama. Though not as much flair as Bryant either I suppose.

I'd much, much rather own Tate than Bryant. Maybe not the flashy name, but he will be more productive and no risk.

Yeah, Tate's not going to wow people or have owners knocking down your door to acquire him, but all he does is catch 90+ passes per season. Over the past couple years I've pegged Tate as the arbitrage play to Landry.

[JJDubya]

Bryant just went for 1.08 in one of my leagues. I don't like him valued that high, as I don't like the risk and think Pittsburgh has probably moved on in terms of gameplanning. He's not reliable so I doubt he sees a full complement of snaps this year until they're headed to the playoffs. I think you can get more for him.