Evans or Picks?

[nbigley325]

Which one you want?

[pierson242]

Evans

[Jason3123]

How do you know both picks are going to be late?

I think I'd take the 4 firsts plus Parker, in a vacuum. Depends on league settings and my roster construction though. Essentially you're getting 5 firsts for a player which is something I would never pay for a player.

[BelichekYourSelf]

Evans easily for me.

You'd have to get really lucky for one of those pieces to come anywhere close to what Evans is.

A bunch of Quarters and dimes doesn't equal a dollar. And this is not just Evans for 5 picks. It'd be Evans minus 4 other players for the picks.

[gogobradyarm]

This is 5 firsts in value for one player. I'm going to say it depends on team makeup. In a vacuum its even to me.

[nbigley325]

The guy that would get evans has a stacked team. He would be the favorite (If you're reading this thread F you justin)and i was runner up last year. The picks i would be getting are his and id be getting mine back. They should both be later picks. I a little tentative to give him another stud because his team is already a beast and I don't want to concede this year, but it just feels like a ton of value. In our league I'm almost guaranteed Corey davis at the 1.4 should I go that route. I intended for this to be in a vacuum but here's my team as it sits now. I also have the 1.1 and 1.9

A. Rodgers

A.P., Spencer Ware, Rob Kelley, Derrick Henry

Mike Evans, Mike Thomas, Demaryius, Martavis, Snead

Kelce

[Jason3123]

If you could wait until on the clock that would be ideal. But me personally, I'd take Davis/Parker/6 is Mixon/Mike Williams? Plus 2 extra firsts next year? That is a good cash out for Evans in my opinion and would give your team some depth. I also haven't buried Parker like a lot of people so I guess it depends on your evaluation of him. I consider him a pretty strong prospect.

[gogobradyarm]

I don't think you're ready to compete , have a tlot of missing pieces. Without knowing the starting requirements, i'd probably trade Evans. You might be able to get better picks/packages elsewhere though.

[gogobradyarm]

Alternatively, you could trade DT for a RB or picks and take Fournette/Mixon and make a run potentially.

[Petrolbomber]

I don't think you're ready to compete , have a tlot of missing pieces. Without knowing the starting requirements, i'd probably trade Evans. You might be able to get better picks/packages elsewhere though.

This.

[Goddard]

Evans easily for me.

You'd have to get really lucky for one of those pieces to come anywhere close to what Evans is.

A bunch of Quarters and dimes doesn't equal a dollar. And this is not just Evans for 5 picks. It'd be Evans minus 4 other players for the picks.

This. I've said this before, but not all 1st rounds are created equally. If someone offered me 5 late 1sts for 2 early 1sts, I'm taking the 2 early ones. The 1sts in this deal vary and none are top 2. Keep Evans or try and get more. At least get a better player than Parker in return.

[cc texan]

I'm going to be in the minority here, but this seems like peak value for Evans, so I'd do it with that team. His value could take a big hit if he has another slow start to the season.

[lilmink]

I would take the picks. So many picks bound to hit on something and you don't always have to draft with those picks

[thomasscheeks]

Evans by a mile

[crip7300]

I'm the guy who offered the trade for Evans, but I pulled it off the table. Felt it was a little too much value, although Evans is a beast, I don't really NEED him (everyone could always use a Mike Evans). This is for team 2 in sig. and my WR are already stacked. It was a pretty fair offer I thought considering our team make ups and value wise in a vacuum it probably favors the picks and Parker imo. Hey Nate F you too.