[POLL] Bortels or Wentz

[sharkattack]

Simply put, who do you want on your dynasty squad?

[Steelersfan]

Wentz.

[maxhyde]

Wentz

Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk

[A-train]

I'm bias as I have Wentz on my roster. I like both but feel Wentz with better receivers will be better then Bortles. Bortles has some good targets and is struggling. Wentz doesn't seem to have much help.

[Payton34]

I'd go with Bortles... I see Wentz as a likely better NFL QB, but I see him as more of a guy who is not going to be a statistical monster (and so I wouldn't be very sad to lose him).

Bortles is definitely a bigger risk to wash out I think, but I think his ceiling IF he gets himself straight is definitely starting fantasy QB level with game winning stats some weeks (Heck, that's not even me guessing. We saw that last season.).

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G930A using Tapatalk

[thomasscheeks]

This should be a no brainer

[Checker1183]

I'd go with Bortles... I see Wentz as a likely better NFL QB, but I see him as more of a guy who is not going to be a statistical monster (and so I wouldn't be very sad to lose him).

Bortles is definitely a bigger risk to wash out I think, but I think his ceiling IF he gets himself straight is definitely starting fantasy QB level with game winning stats some weeks (Heck, that's not even me guessing. We saw that last season.).

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G930A using Tapatalk

x2

[harr]

This should be a no brainer

So you're saying take the guy that has put up a 4,428 yard, 35 touchdown season in the NFL, right? Or no? By no means is this a "no brainer", in my opinion. I'd probably take Wentz long term, but Bortles could absolutely turn things around and put up similar numbers like he did in 2015.

[maxhyde]

Yep. Writing off a young qb that regressed some isnt my style. He was overvalued and overdrafted last year but i think i believe enough i may land him this offseason at a more reasonable price

Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk

[Coogan Football]

This should be a no brainer

So you're saying take the guy that has put up a 4,428 yard, 35 touchdown season in the NFL, right? Or no? By no means is this a "no brainer", in my opinion. I'd probably take Wentz long term, but Bortles could absolutely turn things around and put up similar numbers like he did in 2015.

I agree this is definitely really close for me, definitely not a "no brainer", I'd probably actually take Bortles

[DLF3000]

Same bucket for me. If you twist my arm, Wentz. Bortles and that whole offense was truly offensive this year.

[Dynastycommissioner]

CW for me.

[Jfever]

Big picture, Wentz. I see that offense evolving into something special. He has size, running ability, smarts, work ethic, and can make all throws. It is close so I see both sides. I'm trying to look ahead, and I see Wentz as the better long term fantasy qb if he gets a couple more weapons to go along with Mathews.

[thomasscheeks]

This should be a no brainer

So you're saying take the guy that has put up a 4,428 yard, 35 touchdown season in the NFL, right? Or no? By no means is this a "no brainer", in my opinion. I'd probably take Wentz long term, but Bortles could absolutely turn things around and put up similar numbers like he did in 2015.

Bortles is a garbage time king. He's showing this year just how bad he is. It's a no brainer for me. Just my opinion I guess

[harr]

This should be a no brainer

So you're saying take the guy that has put up a 4,428 yard, 35 touchdown season in the NFL, right? Or no? By no means is this a "no brainer", in my opinion. I'd probably take Wentz long term, but Bortles could absolutely turn things around and put up similar numbers like he did in 2015.

Bortles is a garbage time king. He's showing this year just how bad he is. It's a no brainer for me. Just my opinion I guess

Garbage time is fantasy gold! Wentz will almost certainly be the better NFL quarterback. He might not be the better FANTASY quarterback. Time will tell I suppose.

Sent from my XT1635-01 using Tapatalk