1.01 for parker

[vikesguy]

What do we think about giving up the 1.01+2.08 for parker+2.01+2.02? This is for team in sig and parker would be my 5th wr I can start

[JJDubya]

Not a bad offer at all but your need for 3 RBs has me valuing Zeke higher than Parker for your team.

[TTHTD]

You need RBs bro. Take Zeke or mix an RB prospect you really like into the deal

[Space Cowboy]

3 RBs?? Not even remotely close. To even being close.

[Parker8]

Woooow. You must be a Parker truther but don't mortgage your whole team for him. There is no need to over pay! Get him for way less and wait

[sugbear65]

Im a Parker truther. I don't think this is nearly as far as everyone is making it out to be. It's start 3rb but also 4WR with a flex option. I'd prob do the deal. I like Parker's upside more than Zeke, Elliot looks to be a safe bet for production, but I don't really view him as an elite talent. I think Parker can be. I'd easily take him over any WR in this class, so I think he's worth 1.02+ easy. The pick upgrade and extra 2nd lean this far enough for me to take Parker. d try and find another depth RB another way after the trade, maybe even wait in season and buy one with your 2017 1st, as you look to be a contender.

[wolfjn1]

Zeke will be a fine rb1, but I think Parker is (and will continue to be) more valuable. I'd take Parker.

[Mitchbs]

Parker

[Big Al]

Parker side. I prefer him over anyone in this class plus you get 2 earlier 2nds.

[HeavensToMurgatroyd]

I lean Zeke because of the starting requirements.

[vikesguy]

Seams like a coin flip from the comments. I do have the 1.10 already. So keep zeke and draft wr at 1.10 or trade for parker and draft a couple rbs at 1.10,2.01, 2.02? Can't seem to make up my mind. I like the fact of having parker as my 5th wr but I do need rbs.

[The Fantasy Feud]

Parker

[vikesguy]

Anyone else? I'm torn

[schiewerma21]

Easily Elliot here.

Parker is one of the most overvalued players in dynasty right now.

Reminds me of jmatt from last year. (Size wr1 role potentially in offense) Absolutely a do not buy.

In addition, as long as tannehill is playing qb, he will always look to his blanky Landry first. And we know how reluctant teams are to give up on mediocre qbs.

[Bad News Barrett]

I own Parker in only one league and would give him up in a heartbeat for Elliott. Receivers are easier to find, Parker is hugely overvalued, and you have to start three running backs. This is nuts that people want a receiver with one game over 100 yards over what 99% of mock drafts have as a top 10 NFL draft pick. Be a Parker truther all you want, but this guy isn't the next big thing

FWIW, I traded Derek Carr for Parker...in an 8 team 1 qb league. In general, the dynasty community has reached a point where any young receiver that has a couple of good games becomes worthy of insane prices